My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-07_REPORT - M1980244 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2014-02-07_REPORT - M1980244 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:49 PM
Creation date
2/11/2014 3:22:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/7/2014
Doc Name
Final Report Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />PSES Pipe Rack Liner Extension <br />Final Report ameO <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring &Test Results <br />February 4, 2014 <br />6.5 Destructive Testing <br />AMEC selected destructive test locations based on ECA's completion of approximately <br />748 lineal feet of welding for the primary geomembrane, various working conditions, <br />and on seaming observations (e.g., suspicion of a defective weld). AMEC obtained <br />and tested two fusion seam destructive samples and two extrusion seam destructive <br />samples of the primary geomembrane for the PSES Pipe Rack Liner Extension. <br />ECA constructed approximately 502 lineal feet of fusion welded seams and 246 lineal <br />feet of extrusion welded seams for the primary geomembrane. The specified <br />frequency of destructive testing was one test per 500 lineal feet of weld. AMEC <br />identified and ECA obtained destructive samples from the primary geomembrane <br />panel seams at a frequency of one destructive test sample per 251 lineal feet of fusion <br />welded seams, and one per 123 lineal feet of extrusion welded seams. The test <br />frequencies exceeded project requirements. <br />All destructive test results met or exceeded requirements as presented in the <br />Technical Specifications. The summaries of destructive test results for fusion seams <br />for the PSES Pipe Rack Liner Extension geomembrane are presented in Appendix J.5. <br />Sheet 2 of 2 presented in Appendix A shows the destructive test sample locations. <br />6.6 Non - Destructive Testing <br />ECA performed non - destructive seam testing on completed seams and geomembrane <br />repairs. Non - destructive testing for seams included pressure testing of fusion welded <br />seams and vacuum box testing of extrusion - welded seams and repairs. AMEC <br />monitored and documented the non - destructive testing. <br />Prior to pressure testing of fusion seams, ECA heat sealed both ends of the air <br />channel between the two tracks of the double wedge weld. A pressure gauge was <br />inserted in one end of the sealed channel, the channel was pressurized to <br />approximately 30 pounds per square inch (psi) using an air pump. After pressure <br />stabilization, AMEC monitored the gauge for a minimum of 5 minutes. The maximum <br />allowable pressure drop was 3 psi. <br />ECA and AMEC verified fusion seam continuity before heat sealing both seam ends, <br />completed pressure testing, and with the gauge left in place, cut the opposite end of <br />the seam. If the gauge pressure dropped to zero, the seam was determined to be <br />continuous. In cases where the seam was found to be discontinuous, the seam was <br />subdivided into shorter sections until continuous seam sections were located and <br />passing pressure tests were performed, or the outer edge of the seam was extrusion <br />welded and vacuum tested. <br />If a pressure test failed, ECA checked the seam section for leakage, and repaired and <br />re- tested the seam. If ECA was unable to find the leak, the seam was divided into two <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.