My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-07_REPORT - M1980244 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2014-02-07_REPORT - M1980244 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:49 PM
Creation date
2/11/2014 10:50:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/7/2014
Doc Name
Final Report QA Monitoring and testing volume 1 of 2 doc 1of3 Mill Site Earth works
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
d
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Mill Site Earthworks Project <br />Final Report <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results <br />January 31, 2014 <br />ameO <br />The laboratory test results are summarized in Tables 5 through 11 presented in <br />Appendix H. <br />4.1.1 Grain Size Distribution <br />AMEC analyzed the grain size distribution (gradation) of UFM, CSB, SSF, PBM, OVF, <br />SLF, and DCF samples. The results of the gradation analyses are presented in <br />Appendix HA and summarized in Tables 5 through 11. <br />AMEC performed two CQA gradations of UFM. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 262 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of <br />one test per 5,000 cubic yards. The UFM CQA gradation results met Project <br />Specifications; the results are presented in Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 5. <br />AMEC performed one CQA gradation of CSB. The CSB CQA gradation results met <br />Project Specifications; the results are presented in Appendix H.1 and summarized in <br />Table 6. <br />AMEC performed four CQA gradations of SSF. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 1,265 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of <br />one test per 50,000 cubic yards. The SSF CQA gradation met Project Specifications; <br />the results are presented in Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 7. <br />AMEC performed one CQA gradation of PBM. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 500 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of <br />one test per 10,000 cubic yards. The PBM CQA gradation results met Project <br />Specifications; the results are presented in Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 8. <br />AMEC performed 164 CQA gradations of OVF. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 36,929 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of <br />one test per 50,000 cubic yards. The OVF CQA gradation results met Project <br />Specifications; the results are presented in Appendix H.1 and summarized in Table 9. <br />AMEC performed 32 CQA gradations of SLF. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 1,692 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of <br />one test per 4,000 cubic yards. The CQA gradations performed of SLF met Project <br />Specifications; the results are presented in Appendix HA and summarized in Table 10. <br />AMEC performed 25 CQA gradations of DCF. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 4,332 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of <br />one test per 20,000 cubic yards. The DCF CQA gradations met Project Specifications; <br />the results are presented in Appendix HA and summarized in Table 11. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.