My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:47 PM
Creation date
2/7/2014 11:06:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/7/2014
Doc Name
Coulter Filing (Emailed)
From
Peter Coulter
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the case, used my title policy to get property taxes refunded to him by the title company. I wrote a letter <br />to the Supreme Court concerning this matter and never heard anything. But, from an anonymous source <br />inside the judicial system, [who uses a park as a unique return address,] I was told that that Alex <br />Martinez and John Gleason were asked to leave because of this event. I have felt the retribution of this <br />event by these parties also. <br />Bottom line is that there is proof positive that there is a culture of persons within the Judicial <br />branch that issue their own judgments and then make a concerted effort to cover them up. <br />In the instant case, no one could /would tell me the judge's name associated with this case, nor <br />would they give me the name of the staff attorney who issued the ORDER unlawfully in violation of <br />substantive and procedural due process of law. The only way I was able to obtain this information was <br />to file a CORA request with the Colorado Supreme Court Administrative Department. <br />There is absolutely no reason why this information should not be available to the public unless <br />again, it is to cover up some type of hidden agendas. This is no different than having one's Motions <br />being decided by a person in robes and hood in direct violation of CDJ 03 -05 and procedural due process <br />of law. <br />How can there be an ORDER with no signature and a refusal by the Court to provide this <br />information? I would request an investigation and response into these serious issues <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />/s /Peter Coulter <br />303 720 -1811 <br />151 Summer Street #654 <br />Morrison, Colorado, 80465 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.