My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:47 PM
Creation date
2/7/2014 11:06:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/7/2014
Doc Name
Coulter Filing (Emailed)
From
Peter Coulter
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ubIic .access(@iudicial.state.co.us <br />Justice Monica Marquez, Supreme Court Chair, <br />Public Access Committee. <br />cc: Certified mail 9114901159818423794662 Governor Hickenlooper <br />RE: Chief Justice Directive 05 -01; access to Court Records. <br />January 10, 2014 <br />Justice Marquez, <br />Public Access Committee: <br />I have a current appeal filed (13CA1453) While it is filled with inconsistencies by the Court and <br />its refusal to make findings or explain why it won't accept a Rule 60 Motion, of importance here is the <br />issuance of "ORDERS" by anonymous parties and the refusal to provide documentation directly <br />associated with the case in compliance with Chief Justice Directive 05 -01. A review of the records shows <br />an ORDER with no Judges name or signature and then the initials "JB /sa. This was /is followed by an <br />unsigned certificate of service. <br />My first inclination then and now is that there is a subculture of persons in the Judicial <br />Department that make decisions on their own admonition and then bury the results. This is not just an <br />off the cuff remark as I have documentation of magistrates (Edward Burns) who removed Jury Fees and <br />corresponding requests including ORDERS from the Supreme Court from the official Court registry. In <br />other words, if you look at the official court registry, it looks as if there was no jury requested; but the <br />cash receipt shows there was. Additionally, Magistrate Burns with Head Clerk Tamara Herivel removed <br />all documentation referring to said jury request, including Court Orders from the Colorado Supreme <br />Court. After I reported them stolen to the Arapahoe County Sheriff, they miraculously reappeared <br />except for the jury demand, associated fee and the Supreme Court Order. There was one issue though; <br />the Court stamp [on the new documents] is above the N/L stamp. That's impossible as I was /am a prose <br />litigant and had to file everything personally to the Court clerk. The original documents had the court <br />stamp below the L/N stamp. The documents were frauds meant to cover up the criminal actions of <br />Edward Burns and Tammy Herivel [with the help of Charles Pratt and Chris Cross] and eventually cost <br />me in excess of $4M. <br />And in another instance, I reported attorney William G. Ross to the Attorney Regulation <br />Commission for screwing up a closing, keeping the funds for the title policy and practicing while his <br />license was under suspension. John Gleason was handling the investigation. He eventually told me that <br />Mr. Ross would be suspended for 3 years and that I would have to go after him personally for the title <br />policy fees. It cost me millions. The last thing I asked of Mr. Gleason was a copy of the Order pertaining <br />to Mr. Ross. That was 1994. In 2012, 1 again asked for a copy of the ORDER and Mr. Gleason denied me <br />saying now I was not entitled to that information. I then find out that Mr. Buchwald, an adverse party in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.