My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-22_PERMIT FILE - M2013064 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2013064
>
2014-01-22_PERMIT FILE - M2013064 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 9:48:11 AM
Creation date
1/23/2014 2:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2013064
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/22/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W AW RECEIVED <br />7tittleApplegateJne. JAN 2 2 2014 <br />Consultants for Land, Mineral and water llewolopment Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining & Safety <br />Memorandum <br />Date: 45-00 <br />To: Path Acre <br />From: Steve Nguyen 60 <br />Subject: - Hanes Property <br />TA Job # 00 -153 <br />The Hanes Property is located in Section 10, Township 5 N, Range 65 W, east of Greeley near the confluence <br />of the Cache la Poudre and the South Platte Rivers. Due to the location near the confluence, the gravel deposits <br />are much deeper with bedrock estimated at 60-80 feet. Prior to the purchase of this property, there are different <br />and land uses that should be considered. <br />The intent of this letter is to provide a brief understanding of the various end land use alternatives. No <br />evaluation was performed for this site specifically, but the estimates given are based on past experiences and <br />knowledge of the area. The estimates are merely' provided to help understand the potential values and costs <br />associated with each alternative, but are limited by the fact that a detailed evaluation has not been completed for <br />this particular site. <br />There are three end land uses that can be considered with a gravel pit: <br />Alternative A -- The gravel pit will be backfilled. This end land use alternative requires no augmentation of <br />evaporative losses. <br />Alternative B — The gravel pit will be left unlined. This end land use alternative requires augmentation of <br />evaporative losses. <br />Alternative C — The gravel pit will be developed into Iined storage. This end land use alternative requires <br />creating water storage by lining the gravel pit to segregate the lake from the surrounding groundwater system. <br />Alternative A - BackHU <br />This is a potential and land use to eliminate any augmentation responsibility. Because the gravel deposits are so <br />deep, howcvcr, thorc most likely is not enough overburden to backfill the entire pit. <br />11990 Groat Street, Suite 304 • bcuver, Colorado 80233 & (303} 452 -6611 • (Fax) 452 -2759 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.