My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-12-03_INSPECTION - M1986015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2013-12-03_INSPECTION - M1986015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:46 PM
Creation date
12/4/2013 4:46:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
12/3/2013
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Continential Materials Corporation
Inspection Date
11/15/2013
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M- 1986 -015 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: TC1 <br />INSPECTION DATE: November 15, 2013 <br />features to try to determine the subsurface size and geometry to develop alternative mitigation techniques. <br />TMOP committed to complete the backfill in the northwest corner of the northeast Phase 2 area. <br />Regarding the Phase 2 overburden/topsoil stockpile west of the Cooper property, TMOP indicated they will <br />begin removing the material in the January - February 2014 time frame and have the material removed by May <br />30, 2014. <br />TMOP stated they would have the stormwater ditch intended to drain the south end of the Winters property that <br />floods completed by April 1, 2014. <br />Current Stipulations: <br />There are currently no stipulations. <br />Records: <br />• The latest formal inspection was conducted 4/12/2007. No problems were cited. This inspector also <br />performed an informal pre - operational inspection related to Amendment 4, phase 7 eastern expansion on <br />10/28/2011. No problems were cited. <br />• The permit anniversary date is November 12. Annual fees and reports are current through 2013. <br />• The permitted area is 466.16 acres with a maximum allowed disturbed area of 268 acres. <br />• The DRMS has copies of the "As- Constructed" drawings for the slurry wall. These drawings are dated <br />3/12/2009. <br />• The approved reclamation permit states the operator will continue to monitor groundwater levels in <br />wells within 600 feet of the permit boundary. No groundwater monitoring data has been filed with the <br />DRMS. This is cited as a problem on page 1 of this report. <br />Bond: <br />The current financial warranty is a $2,288,004 corporate surety. The bond was reviewed as part of Amendment <br />4, approved in December 2011 and determined to be adequate. <br />Review: <br />Based on review of the CGS collapsible soils report and conversations with current and former CGS personnel, <br />the DRMS believes the soils in the area are susceptible to dispersion and piping that could result in the observed <br />collapsed soils in the vicinity of 25th Lane. <br />Figures 2 through 5 (Attachment A) indicate water levels in nearby wells reaching a low in 2009. The 25th <br />Lane wells (Figure 5) and MW -105 appear to have rebounded in 2011 and remained relatively stable, with the <br />exception of a 10 -foot elevation increase measured in MW -105 in May of 2011 (Figure 4). This is about the <br />same time (summer of 2011) that Ms. Winters confirmed cracks began occurring on the Cooper property. This <br />correlation may or may not be significant, and the DRMS has no information indicating this sudden increase <br />was or was not related to mine activity. Anecdotal evidence stated by the complainants of ponded water in the <br />northeast portion of Phase 2 in 2011 may have created a condition that contributed to potential piping of fine <br />grained soils at that time. Figure 3 indicates there is a difference in the subsoils between the Cooper well and <br />the Winters well. The Winters well bore log indicates a 15 -foot thick yellow clay layer that does not appear to <br />be present in the Cooper well bore log. This may explain the difference in the observed cracks and holes on the <br />Cooper and Winters properties. <br />While the available data suggests a possible cause and effect relationship between the mine's activities <br />Page 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.