My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-11-27_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2013-11-27_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:35 PM
Creation date
12/2/2013 7:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/27/2013
Doc Name
Initial Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Greg Smith
Type & Sequence
TR68
Email Name
SB1
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 10 of 10 <br />c. C23 was shifted. Has its size been verified? <br />d. Culverts C52 and C54 remain on the revised version of Map 14. If they have been <br />removed on the ground, they should be removed from the map <br />24. RDA <br />a. The response is sufficient <br />b. The response is sufficient <br />c. The road has not been removed on the revised version of Map 13 <br />d. The response is sufficient <br />e. The response is sufficient <br />f The response is sufficient <br />25. Development Waste naming conventions <br />See comments under 13.g <br />Map labels should be altered to match the naming convention adopted in the text. <br />26. Topsoil <br />Extensive comments were made concerning topsoil above (see 13.u). <br />The Division acknowledges that basing a reclamation cost estimate (RCE) on a "worst case <br />scenario" is a fair way to proceed. <br />Since any importation of topsoil increases the RCE significantly, the Division suggests that it would <br />be prudent to re -write the section of the permit discussing topsoil. The re -written text would <br />describe which areas are to receive topsoil, with their acreage (with reference to Maps 15 & 16). <br />Topsoil stockpile and borrow -area locations would be described, with their volumes. The only <br />complex part of the topsoil balance concerns the RDA which could be handled as discussed above <br />(see 13.u) <br />Rule 3.02.2 - Determination of Bond Amount <br />For now the Division feels it is appropriate to say that the RCE will be updated after the relevant <br />adequacy issues have been resolved. It must be recognized, however, that there is currently a shortfall <br />between the amount of bond posted by NECC and the Division's RCE. This situation cannot be allowed <br />to persist indefinitely. It is incumbent on NECC to respond to this adequacy review in a timely manner <br />so that the RCE can be finalized and the amount of bond posted brought into line with the RCE. <br />Sincerely, <br />QA1 <br />Leigh Simmons. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Ron Thompson <br />Kent Gorham, Gorham Energy Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.