My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-11-21_PERMIT FILE - M2005044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2005044
>
2013-11-21_PERMIT FILE - M2005044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:24 PM
Creation date
11/22/2013 3:15:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005044
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/21/2013
Doc Name
Response to Questionnaire
From
Lincoln County Land Use Office
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
d
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hoffman Pit Response <br />RE: Hoffman Pit; DRMS File No. M -2005 -044; Adequacy Review No.1 (CNO1) <br />Application <br />1. On page 4, No. 16 of the Application Form, the Applicant has stated that 17.58 acres will be added to the <br />existing site. However, the first page of the Application indicates that 24.2 acres will be added to the existing <br />9.9 acre permit area. Please clarify this discrepancy. <br />The new boundaries were changed at the Road Foreman's request aver the application was being drafted. 1 did <br />not catch that I had neglected to update that information. The 24.2 acres is the correct value. Please see revised <br />page 4. <br />6.4.1 Exhibit A - Legal Description <br />No comment. <br />6.4.2 Exhibit B - Index Map <br />No comment. <br />6.4.3 Exhibit C - Pre - mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br />2. As required by Rule 6.2.1(2)(e), please revise the Mining Plan Map to include a map scale. The acceptable <br />range of map scales shall not be larger than 1 inch = 50 feet, nor smaller than 1 inch = 660 feet. <br />Please see revised map. <br />3. As required by Rule 6.4.3(c), please revise the Mining Plan Map to include the existing topography of the <br />area with contour lines of sufficient detail to portray the direction and rate of slope of the affected land. Also, <br />include the appropriate contour interval on the revised map. <br />As per our conversation, I don't have access to this level of mapping for the Hoffman Pit area. On the revised <br />map, I have indicated the current slopes of the walls. (During your last inspection, the South wall was pretty <br />much sheer. The R &B foreman has advised me that they have been grading it to a 214:1 V slope. <br />4. As required by Rule 6.4.3(e), please revise the Mining Plan Map to include the type of present vegetation <br />covering the affected lands. <br />See revised Map <br />5. As required by Rule 6.4.3(g), please revise the Mining Plan Map to include all permanent man-made <br />structures within two hundred feet of the affected land. The railroad line on the south side of the affected area is <br />considered to be a permanent man-made structure. <br />Please see revised map <br />6. If the Hoffman Pit will be mined in phases, then please illustrate the phases on the Mining Plan Map. <br />We have deleted phase mining as discussed. <br />6.4.4 Exhibit D - Mining Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.