Laserfiche WebLink
(deceased); 2010PR204 and 2013PR56, Jefferson County District <br />Court. <br />II. COMPLIANCE WITH C.A.R. 28(k) <br />3. This C.R.C.P. Rule 60 (Relief from Judgment or Order) (See pg. <br />11 for recital of Rule.) Motion arises after the October 23rd, <br />2013 discovery of a subsequent Power of Attorney dated June <br />19,2006, naming Ted Coulter as sole agent for Irene Coulter; <br />invalidated the April 21, 2006 Power of Attorney for Irene <br />Coulter that Paula Coulter fraudulently produced to various <br />persons, entities and the Court (with the assistance of John <br />Berman, Esq., an officer of the Court) to persuade them that <br />she /they were acting on behalf of their fiduciary, Mrs. <br />Coulter, via said Power of Attorney. C.R.C.P. Rule 60(b) (2) <br />gives the Court explicit authority and jurisdiction to <br />relieve parties such as the Appellant from Judgments, Orders <br />or Proceedings where adverse parties, such as Paula Coulter, <br />her counsel, John Berman and brother Ted Coulter committed <br />continued Fraud and /or Fraud on the Court. Specifically, (but <br />not exclusively) obtaining the Conservatorship and <br />Guardianship of Irene Coulter through a perjured sworn <br />Petition where Paula Coulter affirms that the void and <br />fraudulent Power of Attorney dated April 21, 2006 gave her <br />fiduciary precedence in being Conservator and Guardian for <br />Mrs. Irene Coulter. <br />