Laserfiche WebLink
COMES NOW the Appellant Peter Coulter, pro se, for his <br />Amended Motion to void Paula Coulter's April 21, 2006 power of <br />attorney as Fraud upon the Court and all orders and findings <br />thereof; complete joint restitution of Mrs. Coulter's assets <br />from 2004 to the present by the Appellees; perjury, abuse of a <br />person at risk; attorney fees, costs; sanctions and <br />recommendation of criminal proceedings pursuant to C.R.C.P. Rule <br />60;Relief from Judgment or Order; C.R.S. §18 -8 -502, Perjury in <br />the first degree; C.R.S. §18- 8- 610,Tampering with physical <br />evidence; C.R.S. §26- 3.1Financial exploitation of at -risk <br />adults; C.R.S. §18 -9 -113, Desecration of a venerated object; and <br />C.R.S. §15 -12 -723, Assets concealed or embezzled; and as good <br />cause would state as follows: <br />I. CERTIFICATION <br />1. PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 121 § 1 -15(8) No party has made an entry <br />of appearance into this case other than the Appellant. In a <br />September 24, 2013 Email regarding this Appeal, Mr. Berman <br />stated to the Appellant when asked about this requirement: "I <br />oppose these Motions as well as your entire proceeding." <br />2. Because of the relevance and importance of this Motion, <br />Movant will forward courtesy copies to all parties listed in <br />117 below, in addition to all parties of In Re: Irene Coulter <br />