My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-11-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2013-11-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:11 PM
Creation date
11/12/2013 9:43:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/10/2013
Doc Name
Morgan Stanley Demand Letter
From
Peter Coulter
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
DIH
JHB
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of Mr. Berman was filing a Fraudulent and Misleading Motion <br />in 2013PR56 where he stated that Paula Coulter had the <br />authority as the prescribed Personal Representative (from a <br />Fraudulent Will and Power of Attorney) to dig up" and <br />desecrate the remains of Leland Coulter who had been laid <br />to rest 22 years earlier in the Coulter family plot at <br />Olinger Crown Hill Cemetery. There acts shock the <br />conscience. <br />30. Ted and Paula Coulter hatched a scheme sometime back <br />in the turn of the century to take advantage of an at -risk <br />person, our Mother, Irene Coulter. Further, they decided to <br />do it at the detriment of Peter Coulter who they later <br />refused to let see his Mother for the sole despicable <br />purpose of protecting their "gold mine ". They kept this act <br />up throughout the Conservator and Guardianship case <br />(2010PR204) and have continued in Mrs. Coulter's current <br />Probate case (2013PR56) . As in the Conservator case; Mr. <br />Berman refuses to provide a list of Assets of Irene Coulter <br />even though the record indicates at least 10 different e- <br />mail requests that went unanswered. The only possible <br />" The Appellant uses "dig -up" intentionally. "Disenter" should only be used when there is a proper hearing. There <br />was no hearing or notice here. As such, this is nothing short of desecration of Leland Coulter's remains. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.