My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981010 (44)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
_INSPECTION - C1981010 (44)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2020 5:13:23 PM
Creation date
11/4/2013 10:31:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Forrest Luke
Inspection Date
10/24/2013
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 24,2013 C-1981-010/Trapper Mine JLE <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> N -Air Resource Protection N -Roads <br /> N -Availability of Records N -Reclamation Success <br /> R -Backfill&Grading R -Revegetation <br /> N -Excess Spoil and Dev.Waste N -Subsidence <br /> N -Explosives N -Slides and Other Damage <br /> N -Fish&Wildlife N -Support Facilities On-site <br /> R -Hydrologic Balance N -Signs and Markers <br /> R -Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan N -Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> R -Other N -Special Categories Of Mining <br /> N -Processing Waste R -Topsoil <br /> COMMENTS <br /> This was a partial inspection of the Trapper Mine;DRMS File No. C-1981-010,operated by Trapper Mining,Inc. <br /> (TMI). I,Jared Ebert of the Colorado Division of Reclamation,Mining and Safety(Division)conducted the <br /> inspection. Mr.Forrest Luke with TMI accompanied me on the inspection. The weather was clear and sunny. <br /> BACKFILL and GRADING—Rule 4.14; Contemporaneous Reclamation 4.14.1;Approximate Original Contour <br /> 4.14.2;Highwall Elimination 4.14.1(2)(f); Steep Slopes 4.14.2,4.27; Handling of Acid and Toxic Materials <br /> 4.14.3; Stabilization of Rills and Gullies 4.14.6: <br /> TMI submitted a Phase I bond release application for 120.4 acres of affected land within portions of the Z-Pit,Ash <br /> Disposal Pit and K-Pit. Specifically 75.4 acres in Parcel Z-A-13, 15.6 acres in Parcel A-B-13 and 29.4 acres in <br /> Parcel K-A-13. The Division evaluates the reclamation parcels to determine if the affected areas have been <br /> backfilled and graded in accordance with the approved post mine topography. These parcels can be viewed on the <br /> SL15 Bond Release maps. <br /> Part of the evaluation of these parcels for Phase 1 bond release is that the Division compares the approved Post <br /> Mining Topography(PMT)as depicted on Map M12 in the permit to the actual on the ground topography after <br /> backfilling and grading has occurred. Trapper submitted on map that depicts the actual on the ground topography <br /> after backfilling and grading occurred;the SL15 bond release map. During the field inspection,the Division <br /> confirms the on-the-ground topography using a YUMA GPS unit. <br /> Using ArcMap 10,the Division is able geo-reference the approved PMT Maps and the SL15 Bond Release Maps. <br /> These maps can overlay each other allowing for a visual comparison of the topography. The Division then places <br /> transects through the reclamation parcels to be evaluated. Along each transect,multiple sample points are placed <br /> where the transect intersects a contour line on the PMT map,map M12 from the permit. The elevation of each of <br /> these points is interpolated from the PMT maps and the SL15 maps. During the ground inspection,the Division <br /> walks each of these transects and logs the elevation at each sample point using a Trimble YUMA GPS unit. Many <br /> variables affect the precision of the elevations measured with the GPS unit,however the error in the elevation <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.