Laserfiche WebLink
NH 2011 ARR Review <br />Requirement <br />Rules <br />Permit (PR 6) <br />Specific Requirement <br />Information Provided /source /Details on Requirement <br />Division comments <br />1 <br />Miscellaneous <br />List of Attachments <br />THE TABLE OF CONTENTS IN THE ARR INDICATES THAT THERE ARE THREE ATTACHMENTS, A, B AND C - THESE DO NOT HAVE A TITLE PAGE SEPARATING THEM <br />IN THE ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. A TITLE PAGE FOR EACH ALSO BE HELPFUL. ALSO, "2011 SEEDING" 15 MISSING FROM THE LIST OF ATTACHMENTS. <br />2 <br />2.04.13(1) <br />Permit page 2.05.4(2)(e) -25 <br />Due Date 3/15/2013 <br />OK, Received 2/15/12 <br />No problems noted. <br />3 <br />2.04.13(1)(a) <br />Name and address of the <br />OK, provided on ARR form. <br />No problems noted. <br />permittee and permit number <br />4 <br />2.04.13(1)(b) <br />Location and number of acres <br />NH1: Exhibit 2011 -2 shows pre -1993 disturbance at NI-11. NH2: <br />NH2: THE TOTAL NEW DISTURBANCE INDICATED ON EXHIBIT 2011 -3 (36.66 AC) DOES NOT ADD UP CORRECTLY, PLOT A (19.82 AC) PLUS PLOT B (14.85 AC) <br />disturbed <br />Exhibit 2011 -3 shows new disturbance at NH2, which is indicated as <br />EQUALS 34.67 AC, NOT 36.66 AC AS INDICATED IN EXHIBUT 2011 -3 AND THE ARR REPORT AND FORM. THE "LAST YEAR'S" CUMULATIVE TOTAL REPORTED IN <br />36.66 ac in the ARR report and form. Exhibit 2011 -12 shows 164.75 <br />THE 2011 ARR FORM DOES NOT MATCH THE NUMBER THAT WAS USED FOR THE 2010 CUMULATIVE TOTAL VALUE FROM THE 2010 ARR FORM (REVISED) <br />acres in the active mining area. This number agrees with the ARR <br />(645.66 AC). <br />report and form. <br />5 <br />2.04.13(1)(c) <br />Location and number of acres <br />Exhibit 2011 -7 shows areas backfilled and graded in 2011 at NH2, <br />According to ARR Report, the 25.43 acres were final graded. This area is located in the W and NW area of NH2 Mine Permit Boundary on both Morgan and non - <br />backfilled and graded <br />which is indicated as 25.43 ac in the ARR report and form and in <br />Morgan property. The "Last Year's" Cumulative total reported in the 2011 ARR Form matches the cumulative total value from the 2010 ARR Form. No problems <br />Exhibut 2011 -7. <br />noted. <br />6 <br />2.04.13(1)(d) <br />Location and number acres <br />6.8 acres, ARR form (all NH2). Exhibit 2011 -6 depicts the 6.8 acres <br />The "Last Year's" Cumulative total reported in the 2011 ARR Form matches the cumulative total value from the 2010 ARR Form. No problems noted. <br />topsoiled <br />that were topsoiled in Zone 7. <br />7 <br />2.04.13(1)(e) <br />Annual Reporting, Permit page <br />Species, location and number of <br />15.6 acres newly seeded (2011 DP plots A, B and C on Exhibit 2011 -4) <br />THE 2011 DP SEEDING ACREAGE IS NOT CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE ARR AND EXHIBIT 2011 -4, EITHER 15.5 OR 15.6 AC. The "Last Year's" Cumulative total <br />2.05.4(2)(e) -74 <br />acres of vegetation planted during <br />and acreage reported on ARR form (all NH2). Note that dryland <br />reported in the 2011 ARR Form matches the cumulative total value from the 2010 ARR Form. THE LEGEND ITEM FOR 2011 SEEDING IN EXHIBUT 2011 -4 <br />that year, including any augmented <br />pasture uses seed mix #8. Seed tags provided in ARR. According to <br />SHOULD BE PURPLE TO MATCH THE COLOR USED IN THE MAP. Examined Exhibit 2011-4 and compared with Revised Map 2.05.4 -5 PMLU from PR 6: The areas <br />seeding, planting, reseeding, <br />the ARR report, interseeding was not performed during 2011. <br />seeded to dryland pasture in 2011 were verified as being indicated as the same PMLU in Revised Map 2.05.4 -5 in Permit. Also examined the attachment (TITLE <br />interseeding or cultural practices. <br />NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO TOC) showing seed mixes used and seed tags, (NOTE THE ATTACHMENT IS MISSING TITLE PAGE IN ARR). ALTHOUGH THE SPECIES IN <br />Discrete areas planted with <br />SEED MIX ( #8) INDICATED IN EXHIBIT 2011 -4 MATCHED THOSE INDICATED IN THE PERMIT (PR 6), THE TOTAL ON THE EXHIBIT DOES NOT MATCH. THE <br />specific seedmixes should be <br />NUMBERS EXHIBIT 2011 -4 SHOULD REFLECT THE CORRECT TOTAL OF 5.8 (15.8 WITH STERILE TRITICALE) PLS /ACRE TO MATCH THE TOTAL IN THE PERMIT <br />indicated, and seedtags, invoices <br />ASSUMING THIS IS A TYPO. ALSO, SEED MIX #8 IN THE 2011 ARR REPORT SHOWS THE TOTAL AS 5.8 (W \KOCHIA). THE SEED TAG FOR SEED MIX #8 WAS ALSO <br />or other comparable <br />EXAMINED IN COMPARISON TO THE PERMIT AND ARR SEED MIXES. THE SPECIES MATCH, NOT SURE ABOUT THE PLS LEIS - THE SEED TAGS WERE NOT <br />documentation should be <br />REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ENTIRE PURCHASE. THE "LAST YEAR'S" CUMULATIVE TOTAL REPORTED IN 2011 ARR FORM MATCHED THE CUMULATIVE TOTAL <br />included; <br />VALUE FROM THE 2010 ARR FORM. <br />8 <br />2.04.13(1)(f) <br />Location, number of acres and <br />The ARR report states that - 3.1 acres of IP were drill seeded in the <br />THE ARR STATES THAT 4.9 ACRES OF DP (PLOTS D, E AND F) WERE RESEEDED IN 2011 WHEREAS EXHIBIT 20114 INDICATES THIS ACREAGE AS BEING 4.7 AC. A <br />date of planting for all previously <br />spring of 2011. The ARR states that 4.9 acres of DP were reseeded in <br />DIFFERENT LEGEND ITEM ON EXHIBIT 2011 -4 TO IDENTIFY THE REPLANTED 3.1 ACRE AREA ON BENSON EAST WOULD BE HELPFUL. Examined Exhibit 2011 -4 <br />revegetated areas (AKA <br />2011 (2011 DP plots D, E and F on Exhibit 2011 -4). <br />and compared with Revised Map 2.05.4 -5 PMLU from PR 6: The areas REseeded to dryland and irrigated pasture in 2011 were verified as being indicated as the <br />reseeding ? ?) <br />same PMLU in Revised Map 2.05.4 -5 in Permit. PAGE 3 OF THE ARR, UNDER "NEW FIELD SEEDING AND INTERSEEDING" STATES THAT THE "BENSON WEST" <br />PROPERTY WAS RESEEDED WHEN THE "BENSON EAST" PROPERTY WAS ACTUALLY RESEEDED. NOTE, ACCORDING TO THE PERMIT, IN SEED MIX #5, ALFALFA <br />SEED MUST BE INOCULATED WITH A SPECIFIC STRAIN OF RHIZOBIUM BACTERIA. PLEASE MENTION WHETHER THIS OCCURRED OR NOT. THE SEED TAG FOR <br />SEED MIX #5 WAS Also examined in comparison to the permit and ARR seed mixes. THE SEED TAG FOR SEED MIX #3 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE ARR. EXHIBIT <br />2011 -4 INDICATES THAT OATS WERE SEEDED AS A COMPANION CROP TO SEED MIX #5 FOR THE IP AREA AT A RATE OF 70 LBS /AC. THE PERMIT (PR 6) STATES <br />THAT "DURING INITIAL SEEDING OF ALL RECLAIMED IRRIGATED PASTURELANDS IP WITH THE PERMANENT SEED MIX AN ANNUAL COMPANION GRAIN COVER <br />CROP OF OATS OR BARLEY WILL BE USED AT THE RATE OF 20 IBS PER ACRE." PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE CORRECT SEEDING RATE WAS USED FOR THE <br />COMPANION CROP. <br />2011 ARR Review <br />Page 1 <br />