My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-29_PERMIT FILE - C1982056 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2013-07-29_PERMIT FILE - C1982056 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:59 PM
Creation date
10/30/2013 9:33:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/29/2013
Doc Name
COAL REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA EXPANSION
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 08EE Coal Refuse Disposal Area Expansion Drainage Designs
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 2009 Foidel Creek Mine * Refuse Disposal Area Expansion — Surface Water Control Plan * Page 3 <br />• Temporary ditches were designed to control runoff from the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm event. Because <br />the postmine channels, including the bench ditches, will be permanent structures left in place at mine <br />closure, the postmine channels were designed to control runoff from the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm <br />event. <br />The channel utility sub - routine contained within SEDCAD4 was used to design the temporary <br />ditches and postmine channels. The design methodology used by SEDCAD4 is based on the limiting <br />permissible velocity method. If the actual design is less than the permissible velocity, the channel is <br />stable. Two design types were evaluated: <br />• erodible channel <br />• riprap channel <br />Channel sections with shallow slopes or low flows are evaluated as erodible. Channel sections with <br />steeper gradients or higher peak flows were stabilized with rock riprap. In accordance with Rule <br />4.05.3, all temporary ditches and postmine channels were designed with a minimum freeboard of 0.3 <br />feet. Rock riprap size was determined using the PADER (Pennsylvania Department of <br />Environmental Resources, Stover, 1990) method. Given the uncertainty in determining rock D50 for <br />steeper slopes, an additional 3- inches were added to the modeling result recommended D 5o size. <br />Channel designs are summarized in Table 2, Channel Design Summary for the Refuse Disposal Area <br />20MMYard Expansion. Hydrologic information in the table includes: <br />• . the design event peak flow (cubic feet per second) <br />• channel gradient (percent) <br />• design velocity <br />• flow depth <br />Minimum channel design information includes: <br />• channel shape (trapezoidal or triangular) <br />• bottom width (trapezoidal only) <br />• side slopes (14:1 V) <br />• design depth <br />• channel lining (bare soil or rock riprap) <br />4.0 Culvert Designs <br />Table 3, 20MM Yard Expansion Culvert Designs, presents the minimum design information for <br />culverts necessary to route the runoff from the 20 million cubic yard expansion. Culvert locations <br />are shown on Drawing C -101, Final Grading Plan and Drawing C -102, Initial Sequence Grading <br />Plan. Design calculations are presented in Attachment B. The analysis assumed that the culverts <br />will generally be no larger than 48- inches. Several of the designs calculated minimum pipe <br />diameters larger than 48- inches; the conversion table included in Attachment B was used to size <br />multiples for design calculations that exceeded 48- inches. <br />• Hydro - Environmental Solutions, Inc. <br />5710` Street, Suite B <br />P.O. Box 772996 <br />Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 <br />Revised 09/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.