Laserfiche WebLink
�v <br />w <br />ilm <br />proof roll and identified a number of locations that required additional work. The areas in question were reworked by ripping <br />the surface and allowing the material to dry before recompacting the material. <br />A proof roll was performed at approximately 12:00 (noon) on Wednesday 8.28.13 with an Ames' tandem water truck. The <br />proof roll was observed by Thorne Clark (Amec), Lesley Mace (CDOT) and Fred Taylor (Yeh and Associates). Four to five <br />areas were identified and marked with paint that required additional work. Ames repaired the areas immediately by ripping the <br />surface with a Cat 160M, GPS enabled grader, allowing the material dry, and then replacing it in lifts less than eight inches. <br />Each lift was then compacted with a Cat CS56B vibratory, 10 -ton, smooth-drum roller with the minimum of four passes (per <br />method specification). <br />Ames saw cut the asphalt on existing US 67 at the fie in locations with the realigned US 67. Traffic control was set for one <br />lane traffic while the saw cutting was being performed. Guardrails were removed and replaced with berm material and Jersey - <br />barriers on the north side of the fill area in preparation to tie the existing highway into the realignment embankment. <br />ft should be noted: during the reporting period the proposed Class 6 ABC material sourced at the Mule Creek Pit was <br />rejected due to material being out specification. On Friday 8.30.13, another source provider was determined and a Class 6 <br />Aggregate Base Coarse (ABC) sample was obtained from the Schmidt Pit in Fountain, Colorado by Yeh and Associates, <br />Amec, and CDOT for laboratory analysis. Results are expected during the next reporting period. <br />South MSE Wall: <br />Ames continued mat construction and underdrain placement during this reporting period. <br />Mats were constructed by placing welded wire baskets along the exterior of the wall's alignment. The baskets were wire -tied <br />together with approximately 2.5 inches of overlap. Approximately 8 foot lengths of Tensar UX1500 geogrid were joined to the <br />18 inch wire welded basket leg lengths to create a 9.5 foot reinforcement length for the wall. Tensar UX1500 was pulled taught <br />against the wire baskets and secured by hand while placing reinforcing fill material. Tensar LH800 geogrid was installed on <br />every other mat for the attachment of the timber facing. Locking tail struts were placed every 16 inches on center mechanically <br />securing the geogrid to the baskets and reinforcing the front face of the basket. A tail strut was also added at the 2% inch <br />horizontal wire overlap of the basket. Face rock was placed in the wire baskets after lining the interior front face of the basket <br />with BX1120 geogrid. Reinforcing fill material and face rock were separated from each other using non -woven geotextile <br />material. The reinforcing fill material was placed in 9 inch lifts and packed with plate tampers within 3 feet of the wall face and <br />with the CS433 vibratory roller on the areas greater than 3 feet in distance from the wall face. <br />Each mat was tested for compaction and moisture content at the completion of mat prior to placement of next mat. <br />Compaction tests performed met or exceeded 95% compaction. Reinforcing fill material was moisture conditioned prior to <br />placement. <br />Ames continued placement of the underdrain at the back of the MSE wall along the face of existing rock. Non -woven <br />geotextile was placed along a trench at the back of the wall where the reinforcing fill meets the native granite wall. Four inch <br />diameter, perforated, corrugated, HDPE piping was laid out in the trench on top of the geotextile. Drain rock was placed over <br />the pipe and wrapped with geotextile with a minimum of 18 inch overlap prior to placement of reinforcing fill. Reinforcing fill <br />was placed in 9 inch lifts and compacted using a Cat CS433E smooth drum vibratory roller. <br />MSE wall components continue to be installed per plans and specifications. <br />It) Storm Water Management <br />Best Management Practices (BMP) are being performed. Erosion control efforts took place during this reporting <br />period. <br />CQA ACTIVITIES: <br />1() Field Activities: Observation of construction activities during this reporting period included: <br />topsoil /overburden stripping, production drilling and blasting, Cut to Fill ADR Haul Road (HR), HWY 67 construction, <br />PSSA Toe Berm Fill placement and compaction, MSE wall construction, Underground remediation and clay processing. <br />Page 3 of 7 MLE2 WE 08.31.13.doc <br />