My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-27_REPORT - C1980007 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2013-09-27_REPORT - C1980007 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:31:42 PM
Creation date
9/30/2013 9:32:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
9/27/2013
Doc Name
Spring 2013 Subsidence Monitoring Report
From
Wright Water Engineers, Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Subsidence Report
Email Name
JRS
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Spring 2013 Subsidence and Geologic Field Observations <br />South of Divide and Dry Fork Mininq Areas (E -Seam) <br />Continuous annual observations find substantial weathering of these crack with edges <br />rounding and crack depths filling with eroded material. Overall, crack widths have <br />remained relatively constant. <br />4. The length of time that tension cracks are expected to be visible, before the effects of <br />erosion and deposition, mass wasting, infilling, and revegetation obliterate them (duration <br />of cracks), is a function of their location with respect to the mine geometry and type of <br />material in which the cracks formed. Crack duration in zones of permanent tensile stress, <br />such as above mine boundaries and unmined pillars between longwall panels, commonly <br />range: 1) from one to three years in colluvium, 2) from three to six years in soft, friable <br />sandstone, and 3) to many decades in hard, durable sandstone (such as at Apache Rocks as <br />discussed above). However, cracks which form in the zone of temporary tensile stress, <br />such as above moving longwall faces, commonly close again when the longwall moves out <br />of their area of influence. This has been particularly noticeable above the E -seam longwall <br />panels. <br />5. Observed mine - induced subsidence effects have been less in the SOD and Dry Fork mining <br />area than were observed annually in the Box Canyon and Apache Rocks mining areas <br />dating back to 1996 (see Table 2, Appendix A for predicted subsidence parameters). The <br />more subdued topography and the fewer cliffs and ledges of the SOD and Dry Fork mining <br />area reduce the potential for rockfall /landslide areas. E -seam mining in the SOD and Dry <br />Fork area has been underway since December 2008 with observations consistent with those <br />cited above. <br />6. Angle of draw calculations for the SOD and Dry Fork mining areas were performed using <br />data collected from the E -seam subsidence monitoring stations and originally included in <br />the Spring 2010 Report as an August 2, 2010 memorandum. This analysis calculated <br />angles between 12.0 and 14.9° and concluded with a recommended maximum angle of <br />draw for the E -seam in the SOD and Dry Fork mining areas of 15 °. However, following a <br />review by the Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety, this analysis was <br />revised and calculations revealed a range between 13.6 and 18.4 °. The revised <br />recommended maximum predicted angle of draw for the E -seam in the SOD and Dry Fork <br />831 - 032.795 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 34 <br />September 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.