Laserfiche WebLink
Loloff Mine <br />TR -0 1 Second Adequacy Letter <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />18. The response is adequate. <br />19. The response is adequate. <br />20. The response is adequate. <br />21. See question #28 below. <br />Rule 6.4.12 Exhibit L - Reclamation Costs <br />22. The Operator will provide a breakdown of the costs of dewatering into phases after the <br />surveying is complete. <br />23. No response by the Operator <br />24. The Division will expect a response under separate cover from Loloff Constructions, Inc.'s <br />legal counsel. <br />Rule 6.4.19 Exhibit S - Permanent Man -made Structures <br />25. Please revise Exhibit C to indicate and label all structures within 200 of the affected <br />boundary. <br />Rule 6.5 - Geotechnical Stability Exhibit <br />26. Division staff is reviewing the revised stability analysis and responses to the Division's <br />memo dated July 30, 2013. <br />27. The response is adequate. <br />Hydrology <br />28. Division staff is reviewing the Operator's hydrology responses to the Division's letter dated <br />August 5, 2013. <br />Please be advised the Loloff Mine technical revision may be deemed inadequate, and the <br />application may be denied on September 25, 2013 unless the above mentioned adequacy <br />review items are addressed to the satisfaction of the Division. If you feel more time is needed <br />to complete your reply, the Division can grant an extension to the decision date. This will be <br />done upon receipt of a written waiver of your right to a decision by September 25, 2013 and <br />request for additional time. This must be received no later than the deadline date. <br />