My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981012 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
_INSPECTION - C1981012 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2020 5:50:46 AM
Creation date
9/12/2013 7:46:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Ron Thompson
Inspection Date
7/23/2013
Email Name
LDS
SB1
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 23, 2013 C-1981-012/New Elk Mine LDS <br /> ACTIONS section of this report. <br /> • Pond 4 was holding a small amount of water,but not discharging. The embankments and spillways were <br /> in good order. <br /> • Clean water culvert C37 was partially blocked and should be cleaned out. <br /> • Ditches and culverts surrounding DWDA 1 were clear and in good order. <br /> • The "new water tank" SAE appeared to be fairly well drained and stable. The berm had not been breached, <br /> however ponded water shows where low spots should be built up. Some non-coal waste should be <br /> cleared and a low spot in the berm should be built up; since this was an item that was identified in <br /> the inspection report of April 29,2013, and is not the subject of a permitting action,the Division <br /> finds that this is a violation for failure to maintain a Small Area Exemption site in accordance with <br /> the approved design. This is discussed further in the ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS section of this <br /> report. <br /> • Ditch D18 was in good shape to the junction with D9 <br /> • Clean water diversion ditch D26 does not exist as shown on map 13, and may be impossible to construct <br /> without compromising the road above. The short leg of the ditch west of the natural drainage has a very <br /> small watershed and is not necessary. East of the drainage,the ditch needs to be cleaned of rocks,non- <br /> coal waste and vegetation,and should be shaped and graded to ensure it functions as designed. The <br /> old section of ditch,running south east from the lower water tank pad, should be reclaimed. Since <br /> these were items that were identified in the inspection report of April 29,2013, and are not the <br /> subject of a permitting action,the Division finds that this is a violation for failure to maintain <br /> ditches in accordance with the approved design. This is discussed further in the ENFORCEMENT <br /> ACTIONS section of this report. <br /> • The water pipe and an old electrical cable that were compromising ditch D26 had been removed. <br /> • Ditch D39AA does not exist on the ground as drawn and the high-wall behind the substation has not been <br /> constructed as shown on map 13,meaning that D39A is also not as drawn. In the same area,the parking <br /> lot has not yet been added to map 13.Neither D39A nor D39AA are necessary on the ground. D39A <br /> should be converted to a light use road to access D26,with a diversion ditch alongside. The ditch <br /> should be extended to merge with ditches draining the area around the East Portal Fan.Mr <br /> Thompson suggested that a new culvert will be needed under the road to the car park, although the <br /> necessary gradient maybe difficult to achieve. Note also that the roads around the fan need to be <br /> shown on the maps. D17A will be a road ditch on the north side of the road.A new ditch will be <br /> needed to drain the water tank road and the new light use road,which will in turn drain to the new <br /> culvert. The lower section of D17B will remain,but culvert C50 and the upper section of D17B don't <br /> exist. The area around the fan should drain to a ditch on the south side and thence into the new <br /> culvert. This re-design should be handled through TR68. <br /> On the north side of the highway: <br /> • The upland diversion above the RDA had large puddles at 2 points;the further east puddle had breached <br /> either side of a big rock. Recent precipitation had dislodged rocks and trees into the ditch in several spots. <br /> The length of the diversion ditch should be surveyed as a starting point to investigate how this <br /> drainage issue can be resolved; since this was an item that was first identified in the inspection <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 0 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> Page 6 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.