Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a e . ramage asms an aJor n u anes <br />RunninJ! Creek Basin <br /> 1. Cabin Gulch <br /> 2. Gold Creek <br /> 3. Hay Gulch <br /> 4. Henderson Gulch <br /> 5. Timber Claim Gulch <br /> 6. Whiskey Gulch <br />Kiowa Creek Busin <br /> I. Dry Creek <br /> 2. Gopher Creek <br /> 0 Little Drv Creek <br /> .'. <br /> 4. Neffs Gulch <br /> 5. West Kiowa Creek <br />Comanche Creek Basin <br /> No Major Tributaries <br />West B!iou Creek Basin <br /> 1. Big Gulch <br /> 2. East Gulch <br /> 3. Spring Branch <br /> 4. Spring Gulch <br /> 5. Station Gulch <br /> <br />T hI 1 D . <br /> <br />B . <br /> <br />d M' T'b t . <br /> <br />3.0 Hydrologic Analysis <br /> <br />Baker completed a hydrologic analysis for each of the drainage basins <br />described above. The peak 100-year discharge was determined for <br />each drainage basin by using the USACE HEC-HMS computer <br />program. <br /> <br />3.1 HEC-HMS Setup <br /> <br />The discharges for the four drainage basins were evaluated using the <br />USACE HEC-HMS Version 3.1.0 computer program (Reference I). <br />Hydrologic techniques developed by the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) were used to compute runoff volumes <br />(SCS curve number loss method) and convert excess precipitation to <br />runoff (The SCS unit hydrograph). The model was created from the <br />best available information as described below. <br /> <br />2 <br />