My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
RGDSS_Historic_CUreport_20040601
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Historic_CUreport_20040601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 10:08:47 AM
Creation date
5/27/2008 2:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS - Rio Grande Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis
Description
The documentation is for the Rio Grande Basin Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis, developed during the RGDSS implementation for the period 1950 through 2002. It includes 100 percent of the crop consumptive use in the basin for the period. Documentation consists of the final Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis Report and supporting appendices.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Modeling Dataset Documentation
Date
6/1/2004
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Water supply-limited consumptive use was determined by including diversion <br />records, conveyance efficiencies, application efficiencies, soil moisture interactions, <br />and supplemental ground water supplies. Pumping in the basin is not generally <br />known, therefore, pumping was estimated through the model analysis. For most ditch <br />systems, the model determined water supply-limited consumptive use and ground <br />water pumping in the following general sequence, termed the "mutual ditch" <br />approach: <br />Surface water was applied to meet irrigation water requirements for all land under <br />the ditch system. If excess surface water still remained, it was stored in the soil <br />moisture reservoir. <br />If the irrigation water requirement was not satisfied, surface water stored in the <br />soil moisture reservoir was used to meet remaining irrigation water requirements. <br />If the irrigation water requirement was still not satisfied, ground water was first <br />pumped to meet remaining irrigation water requirements for sprinkler irrigated <br />lands identified as having a ground water source, up to the maximum permitted or <br />decreed pumping capacity. If pumping capacity was not exceeded, ground water <br />was then pumped to meet remaining irrigation water requirements for flood <br />irrigated lands identified as having a ground water source, up to the remaining <br />pumping capacity. <br />Based on information from water users and administrators, the following large ditch <br />systems were identified as using ground water through their sprinklers, and applying <br />surface water on lands without sprinklers: <br />• Rio Grande Canal <br />• Farmers Union Canal <br />• Prairie Ditch <br />• Excelsior Ditch <br />The model determined water supply-limited consumptive use and ground water <br />pumping for these ditch systems in the following general sequence, termed the <br />"maximum supply" approach: <br />• Ground water was pumped to meet irrigation water requirements for sprinkler <br />irrigated lands identified as having a ground water source, up to the maximum <br />permitted or decreed pumping capacity. <br />• Surface water was applied to meet irrigation water requirements for lands without <br />a ground water source. <br />• Remaining surface water was applied to meet irrigation water requirements for <br />flood irrigated lands identified as having a ground water source. If excess surface <br />water still remained, it was stored in the soil moisture reservoir. <br />• If the irrigation water requirement was not satisfied on lands receiving surface <br />water, surface water stored in the soil moisture reservoir was used to meet <br />remaining irrigation water requirements. If irrigation water requirement was still <br />not satisfied, then ground water was pumped to meet any remaining demand on <br />flood irrigated lands with a ground water source, up to the maximum permitted or <br />decreed pumping capacity. <br />cureport_6-2004.doc 14 of 48 June, 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.