Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />or)1..5~'? <br /> <br />ASPINALL UNIT ACCOUNTING ISSUES <br />APRIL 1, 1996 <br /> <br />Back in January, 1992 Reclamation and the National Park Service (NPS) entered into discussions <br />with the state of Colorado concerning the development of a water service contract for the NPS <br />which would help address issues associated with the federal reserved water right quantification <br />for the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument. Accordingly, the NEPA process for <br />this contract was initiated and a "Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract" issued in <br />March 1993. In addition, since 1992, Reclamation and the NPS have used an example contract <br />accounting process on strictly a trial basis during the Aspinall Unit operations meetings which <br />have been held in January, April and late August of each year. <br /> <br />The state of Colorado is willing to discuss the accounting issues and work towards there <br />resolution. However, we have spent numerous hours working on this contract and related issues <br />already and are of the opinion that not a great deal of progress will be made until the needs of the <br />federal reserved water right and the endangered fish are clearly identified. It was apparent in the <br />scoping meetings that Gunnison Basin interests are not going to buy into any accounting <br />procedure until the quantities of water required by the Monument and the endangered fish are <br />firmly identified and justified. One of the most constructive things the NPS could do from <br />Colorado's standpoint is to identify the amounts of water it would seek in its quantification case. <br />Absent such information, the state of Colorado will be reluctant to spend significant time <br />working on accounting issues. <br /> <br />The purpose of this issue paper is to briefly recount the significant issues which the NPS contract <br />accounting must address. Please bear in mind this is the first attempt t6 recount the significant <br />issues in almost three years and thus it should be considered preliminary and subject to change. <br />Also, as you are aware, there are a number of questions that surround each accounting issue that <br />has been identified below. The Scoping Report and attached comment letters should be consulted <br />for a more complete discussion of the issues. The accounting issues and questions are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />I. Blue Mesa Reservoir Target Elevations <br />Fill by the end of July; <br />Drawdown to 581,000 AF of live storage by December 31 each year; <br />Do not draw below minimum power pool elevation if at all possible. <br /> <br />2. Blue Mesa Storage Accounts <br />Blue Mesa Storage Decrees; <br />Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association Storage; <br />Is there a need for additional storage accounts to handle releases made for <br />purposes in item number 3 below. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Aspinall Unit Storage Releases For <br />Endangered fish by contract; <br />Section 7 consultations; <br />