My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04310
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:16:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.600
Description
Chatfield Reservoir
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
1/1/1984
Author
CWCB
Title
Division of Parks Temporary Storage in Chatfield - Background Data
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~0~' <br /> <br />Fact Sheet <br />Chatfield & Bear Creek Water Supply <br /> <br />1. The reevaluation study of Tri Lakes Reservoirs started in July of 1982 in <br /> <br />conjunction with the Denver Water Board SEIS. The specific request asked for <br /> <br />an investigation of the Reservoir Design Flood and the adequacy of the Probable <br /> <br />Maximum Flood at each project. <br /> <br />2. The results of the Reservoir Design Flood reevaluation were discussed and <br /> <br />presented 'in comment 2 dated 29 Sep 82 (see inclosure 1) to the Chief of Planning <br /> <br />Division. A discussion of the adequacy of the Probable Maximum Flood for each <br /> <br />reservoir was overlooked in that DF. However, special report entitled Hydromet <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />144 (HH #44) was prepared for Chatfield to determine the appropriate probable <br /> <br />maximum precipitation at this location prior to the design and its adequacy should <br /> <br />be acceptable to even the most critical review. The criteria in HMt44 was also <br /> <br />applied to the basins above Bear Creek and Cherry Creek to obtain the PlIT inflow. <br /> <br />3. 'Effect of Using Updated Information. Since the reevaluation was based on the <br /> <br />original design configuration, the available storage figures shown in inclosure 1 <br /> <br />do not reflect the changes in reservoir capacities or changes that have taken place <br /> <br />in conservation storage allocations since the projects were designed: <br /> <br />Chatfield Design Capacity <br /> <br />Top of Flood Pool (Elevation 5500) <br /> <br />235,000 Ac.Ft <br /> <br />100-year Sediment Conservation Storage (El. 5426) <br /> <br />20,000 Ac Ft <br /> <br />Available for Flood Storage <br /> <br />215,000 Ac Ft <br /> <br />Flood storage required under reevaluation is 182,000 Ac ft - which <br />leaves 33;000 Ac Ft vacant for water supply. <br /> <br />'Chatfield Capacity Update '(Oct ,1982) <br /> <br />Top of Flood Pool (Elev. ,5500) <br /> <br />231,400 Ac Ft <br /> <br />Conservation Storage - Foot Hills Agreement (El 5432) <br /> <br />26,700 Ac Ft <br /> <br />Available for Flood Storage <br /> <br />204,700 Ac Ft <br /> <br />204,700 - 182,000 leaves 22,700 Ac Ft vacant for water supply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.