Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Bear Creek Desi~n Capacity <br /> <br />Storage Capacity at Spillway Crest (El. 5667) <br /> <br />- <br />55,300 AC.Ft <br />28, 600_.~c, Ft <br /> <br />Reservoir Design (Rainfa~l SPF) (El. 5635.5) <br /> <br />Conservation Storage - 100-year Sediment (El 5558) <br /> <br />2,OO~ Ac'Ft <br /> <br />Available for flood storage <br /> <br />53,300 Ac Ft <br /> <br />Flood storage required under reevaluation is 38,000 Ac Ft (routing of <br />500-year 60-day volume) - which leaves 15,300 Ac Ft vacant for water <br />supply storage. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />Bear Creek Capacity Update (Mar 1983) <br />Storage capacity ~t Spillway Crest (El 5667) <br /> <br />58,400 Ac ,Ft <br /> <br />Conservation Storage - 100-year Sediment (El 5558) <br /> <br />2,000 Ac Fe" <br /> <br />Available for Flood Storage <br /> <br />56,400 Ac Ft <br /> <br />56,400 - 38,000 leaves 18,400 for water suppry. <br /> <br />4. Historical Impacts. <br /> <br />Although it has been demonstrated through the desi~n <br /> <br />calculations that water supply storage is available in Chatfield and Bear Creek, <br /> <br />the true measure of the impacts of these changes can only be demonstrated by a. <br /> <br />simulated operation of the Tri Lakes system. This' was one of many reasons for, <br /> <br />developing the Denver Area Real Time System. The major components of this model <br /> <br />are shown on inclosure 2. With the Reservoir Simulation portion of this model', <br /> <br />many different combinations of storage, releases and downstream channel constraints <br /> <br />were analyzed. These data were displayed in charts and tables that have been previously' <br /> <br /> <br />distributed. Additional displays have been developed showing the impacts on peak <br /> <br />annual pool levels for the simulated period of 1942-1984. These are shown on inclosure~ <br /> <br />5. Impacts on Dam Safety. <br /> <br />Chatfield - The maximum surcharge for this project was based on routing the probable <br /> <br />maximum flood through the reservoir with a starting pool elevation of 5473. This start- <br /> <br />ing elevation corresponds to the storage requirement for a SOO-year spring inflow routing <br /> <br />on top of a 20,000 acre-foot conservation pool. The resulting freeboard was 6.4 feet. <br /> <br />2 <br />