My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Groups Focus on Future
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Water Groups Focus on Future
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:33 AM
Creation date
5/19/2010 1:26:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Seven State
State
AZ
CA
CO
NM
NV
UT
WY
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/25/2004
Author
Theo Stein
Title
Water Groups Focus on Future
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Denver Post <br />Water groups focus on future <br />River 'call' would cut Front Range supply <br />By Theo Stein <br />Denver Post Environment Writer <br />Sunday, April 25, 2004 - <br />The state's top water users will be sitting down this year to plan for what was once unthinkable: a <br />federal demand that Colorado shut down its water users to provide more water for California. <br />Colorado will also have to re- evaluate its intent to begin a huge dam - building program to create <br />more water storage if the drought continues, said Scott Balcom, the state's representative to the <br />seven -state Colorado River Commission. <br />On Wednesday, Balcom told the legislature's Joint Agriculture Committee that water users and state <br />officials also need to develop a unified position to help in any future negotiations about how to <br />manage the river during a long -term drought. <br />No meetings have been set for the working group, but Colorado Water Conservation Board director <br />Rod Kuharich said the state agency is counting on the group to tackle several thorny and unresolved <br />issues. <br />One big question for examination is how to keep water flowing to Front Range cities if Colorado is <br />forced to release water from its reservoirs for use by California, Nevada and Arizona. <br />"There are a number of large users, like cities, that really can't shut off water completely," Balcom <br />said. "The increment used by cities will have to be made up by other sources." <br />Under the compact, Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico are required to allow an average of <br />7.5 million acre -feet per year to flow past a river gauge below Lake Powell for use by California, <br />Arizona and Nevada. (An acre -foot of water equals about 326,000 gallons, enough water for up to <br />two families for a year.) <br />The four upper -basin states have met their compact obligations during the five -year drought by <br />releasing water from Lake Powell in Utah and Arizona. But the lake is expected to fall below its <br />current 42 percent of capacity by year's end. And federal Bureau of Reclamation officials say the lake <br />could drain completely if the drought continues for two or three more years. <br />Most water delivery across the Continental Divide to the Front Range was developed after the 1922 <br />Colorado River Compact and would be vulnerable to a compact call. <br />Members of the new group will include most of the state's biggest water utilities and conservation <br />districts, including the Denver Water Board, the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and <br />the Colorado River Water Conservancy District. <br />The panel is expected to address a range of issues, including: <br />Will the upper -basin states get credit for water that federal officials have been releasing from Lake <br />Powell to satisfy treaty obligations with Mexico? That could delay the onset of a compact call by a <br />http: / /www.denverpost.com /eda/article /print /0 ,1674,36 %7E53 %7E2104839,00.htm1 4/26/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.