My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Groups Focus on Future
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Water Groups Focus on Future
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:33 AM
Creation date
5/19/2010 1:26:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Seven State
State
AZ
CA
CO
NM
NV
UT
WY
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/25/2004
Author
Theo Stein
Title
Water Groups Focus on Future
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br />year or more. <br />And if there is a compact call, how much will Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico each have to <br />provide to the lower -basin states? <br />"These are questions that have never been asked before," said Eric Wilkinson, general manager of <br />the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. <br />Colorado officials contend the state is legally able to develop another 600,000 acre -feet from the <br />Colorado River, but some hydrologists have questioned whether that water is really there. <br />"We're definitely going to have to reassess the amount of water available to us in the upper basin," <br />Balcom said. <br />Some legislators believe Colorado got shortchanged by the 1922 compact and suggest reopening <br />negotiations on the agreement. <br />State Sen. Jack Taylor, R- Steamboat Springs, asked Balcom whether he supported a new dam - <br />building program to create more storage. <br />"If this drought lasts much longer, it's going to change the rules by which we evaluate new storage <br />projects," Balcom replied. "If there's ever a (compact) call, any new reservoir storage would be <br />junior to the compact, and, bingo, we wouldn't be able to fill new reservoirs." <br />http: / /www.denverpost.com/cda/article /print /0 ,1674,36 %7E53 %7E2104839,00.htm1 4/26/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.