Laserfiche WebLink
<br />bl'(t..)~1J /lMi 11'\.\~f<. ij"l1v- l"\t7 <br />b '. (irWl +J1-+\e\ Co \ Q v".t, tR I vCA/ <br />Iq~l. <br />Co\\ ~LI- \.,~~ ~..~ ...\ S "''''''r''"S ...-\ (f'~-\-I"'\) s~ ~1A""J <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />c..'( "J~CS6,"~ <br />Q7J () '+ <br /> <br />0." Q...{ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />APPENDIX B <br /> <br />FINAL <br />_July 7, 1987 <br /> <br />Analysis of Channel Maintenance and <br />Flushing Flows in the Colorado River <br />at the Palisade Habitat Site. <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife Service identified a channel maintenance flow <br />requirement for the Palisade habitat site of 14,000 cfs in its <br />March 10, 1987 draft report "Palisades Habitat Analysis Using the <br />Instream Flow Incremental Methodology." The Denver Water <br />Department reviewed the March 10 report, and presented comments in <br />a draft letter to John Spinks dated March 23, 1987. The written <br />comments were followed by a meeting on April 15, 1987, between <br />technical staffs for the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Denver <br />Water Department, plus engineering consultants for the Department. <br /> <br />The basic conclusions presented by Denver and its consultants are <br />contained on page 4.3 of a report by Simons,Li and Associates <br />dated May 5, 1983, entitled "Thermal and Sediment Transport <br />Analyses Associated with the GeC Intake:" <br /> <br />The combination of flow regulation from water resources <br />projects, geologic controls, and the gravel, cobble and <br />i boulder bed nature of the stream results in producing a <br />channel which is extremely stable over engineering type <br />time frame (on the order of 100 years). The numerous <br />geologic controls provide points at which both the al- <br />ignment and profile of the Colorado River are control- <br />led and will not be impacted by upstream development. <br />. The gravel, cobble and boulder bed nature of most of <br />the river creates a condition in which the river bed is <br />armored and cannot degrade. The upstream water resource <br />development has increased the effectiveness of channel <br />armoring by reducing the frequency of flows capable of <br />disrupting the armor layer. The high discharges that <br />account for the majority of changes in the system have <br />been reduced in frequency. Thus, the Colorado River is <br />now flowing in a somewhat oversized channel in relation <br />to its present hydrology. <br /> <br />1 <br />