Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />The upper Colorado River can be classified as a supply <br />controlled river in terms of sediment transport. This <br />means that the volume of sediment transported _by the <br />system is controlled by the supply, rather than sedi- <br />ment transport capacity. Throughout the system, the ma- <br />jority of the river has a sediment transport capacity <br />many times greater than the supply. This is evidenced <br />by the fact that although the river transports -mainly <br />wash and sand load, the bed is comprised of gravels, <br />~ cobbles and boulder~. If the supply of sand was closer <br />to the actual transport capacity, the river bed would <br />contain a much larger percentage of sand. Only in iso- <br />lated reaches, which have flatter gradients, is there <br />evidence of a large percentage of sand in the bed. <br /> <br />As a result of its supply control nature, the Colorado <br />River does not have a significant potential for aggrad- <br />ation, since the river has more than enough hydraulic <br />power to transport the incoming sediment load. This, <br />, icombined with the river's low potential for degradation <br />because of the controlling effect of geologic format- <br />ions and the armored stream bed contribute to form a <br />Lhighly stable river. <br /> <br />Analysis <br /> <br />The possible effect of water development projects on geomorphic <br />aspects of the Colorado River. can be divided into two parts, <br />channel maintenance and channel flushing. <br /> <br />Channel Maintenance <br /> <br />Will reduced peak flows result in unstable channel conditions? The <br />above information indicates that a~gradation will not occur (as <br />contrasted with the Green River, wher~ Andrews' (1986) study <br />indicates that decreased sediment transport in the downstream <br />direction is associated with aggradation and decreased channel <br /> <br />2 <br />