Laserfiche WebLink
<br />No QeLl {; ~ esSe, ~r- al . <br /> <br />915 <br /> <br /> <br />LARRy W. HEsSE ET AI.. 327 <br /> <br />Status of Selected Fishes in the Missouri River in Nebraska With <br />Recommendations for Their Recovery <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />Lan-y W. Hesse <br /> <br />Nebraska Game and Parks Commission <br />P.O. Box 934 <br />Norfolk, Nebraska 68701 <br /> <br />Gerald E. Mest! <br /> <br />Nebraska Game and Parks Commission <br />2200 North 33rd <br />Lincoln. Nebraska 68503 <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />John W. Robinson <br /> <br />Missouri Department of Conservation <br />1110 College Avenue <br />Columbia, Missouri 65201 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Abstract. Population density of five species of chubs and two species of minnows in <br />the Missouri River in Nebraska has been reduced by as much as 95% since 1971. Burbot <br />have been nearly extirpated, sauger have been greatly reduced, and blue catfish are rare. <br />Reasons for the decline of these species incl ude removal of snags from. the river; cessation <br />of organic matter and sediment transport because of the construction of large dams on <br />the mainstem. and tributaries; cutoff of floodplain connection through channelization, <br />degradation, and the cessation of flooding; alteration of the natural hydrograph to meet <br />the need for commercial navigation; and reduction of the natural water temperature <br />regime because of deep release of cold water from the 1argEi reservoirs. We propose <br />remedial actions for each of these ecological changes, and we propose listing of several <br />species as endangered in Nebraska. <br /> <br />'} <br /> <br />In 1838, federal engineers initiated the most <br />significant restrocturing of the Missouri River <br />since the last Pleistocene glacier retreated north- <br />ward. Snags were removed, dams were con- <br />structed on the mainstem and tributaries, chan- <br />nels were armored with rock and piling, the <br />natural hydrograph was replaced with a monthly <br />metered flow, sediment and organic matter trans- <br /> <br />port was short-stopped, and the floodplain was <br />made saJe for human development. <br />At the time of construction, nothing was done to <br />mitigate damage to the ecosystem. The impact set <br />in motion by these changes will never be thoroughly <br />quantified, and a semblance of physical and biologi- <br />cal equilibria will not happen again for decades, if <br />ever (petta 1984). We do know that the Missouri <br /> <br />-~>- <br /> <br />:~~> <br />\~ <br />.~ <br />..)1r <br />tl' <br />E;fi;' <br />t~ <br />';I <br /> <br />~.'"I;,. .':"",, <br />~ <br />