Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I q q 7 'Osmu rLd $61'1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:687-698, 1997 <br />@ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1997 <br /> <br />7/~1 <br /> <br />Growth and Survival of Colorado Squawfish in the <br />Upper Colorado River <br /> <br />D. B. OSMUNDSON <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado River Fishery Project, U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service <br />764 Horizon Drive, South Annex A, Grand Junction, Colorado 81506-3946, USA <br /> <br />R. J. RYEL <br /> <br />Department of Rangeland Resources, Utah State University <br />Logan, Utah 84322-5230, USA <br /> <br />T. E. MOURNING <br /> <br />Colorado River Fishery Project, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> <br />Abstract.-Growth and adult survival rates were estimated for the endangered Colorado squaw- <br />fish Ptychocheilus lucius inhabiting the upper Colorado River by using data from fish captured <br />during 1990-1995. Mean annual growth rates of fish aged 3-6 years ranged from 32.2 (age 6) to <br />82.0 (age 3) mm/year. Growth rates for older fish were highest for fish 400-449 mm total length, <br />TL, (42.7 mm/year) and declined to 19.8 mm/year for fish 500-549 mm TL. Fish 550 mm and <br />longer grew an average 9.5 mm/year. Survival rates for fish 550 mm and longer were estimated <br />by comparing measured size distributions with simulated stable age and size distributions; these <br />ranged from 0.83-0.87, with the best fit at 0.85. Though lack of historical data precludes com- <br />parisons with past growth and survival rates, our data serve as a baseline for future population <br />monitoring efforts. <br /> <br />Growth and survival rates, fundamental com- <br />ponents of most demographic studies, are essential <br />to understanding population dynamics and requi- <br />site to formulating recovery and management <br />strategies for endangered species. The Colorado <br />squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius, an endangered, <br />long-lived, cyprinid fish endemic to the Colorado <br />River system of North America, has been the focus <br />of much life-history research. To date, age and <br />growth studies (e.g., Vanicek and Kramer 1969; <br />Seethaler 1978; Hawkins 1992) have relied on <br />standardized scale analysis techniques (e.g., Tesch <br />1968; Carlander 1969). <br />However, scales have proven unreliable for <br />some species (Beamish and McFarlane 1987; Mc- <br />Carthy and Minckley 1987) and have considerably <br />underestimated age in long-lived individuals of <br />many western North American catostomids and <br />cyprinids (Scoppettone 1988). Also, critical vali- <br />dation of aging techniques has been lacking due <br />to a scarcity of known-age individuals. Although <br />aging with other bony structures (e.g., vertebrae, <br />otoliths, opercles) may corroborate results from <br />scales, this constitutt:;s a partial validation at best <br />(Beamish and McFarlane 1983) and requires sac- <br />rifice of these rare animals. <br />Problems specific to aging Colorado squawfish <br />with scales include lack of annulus formation for <br /> <br />most individuals in the first year and compression <br />and loss of outer annuli by older fish (Hawkins <br />1992). Although the first issue can be adjusted for, <br />problems in distinguishing and counting outer an- <br />nuli can result in many fish being assigned to ages <br />near the age point where the method fails (Beamish <br />and McFarlane 1983). Hawkins (1992) suggested <br />that discrepancies in average growth increments <br />for Colorado squawfish greater than total length <br />500 mm (TL) calculated from scales (30 mm/year) <br />and those from recaptured tagged fish (10-15 <br />mm/year) were due to the negative effects of Car- <br />lin dangler tags. Indeed, Floy tags, another exter- <br />nal tag, reduce growth in salmonids (Carline and <br />Brynildson 1972, Mourning et al. 1994), though <br />not in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides <br />(Tranquilli and Childers 1982). <br />The recently developed small, internally im- <br />planted passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag <br />(Biomark, Inc., Boise, Idaho) enhances the per- <br />manent marking of individual fish and reduces or <br />eliminates biases in growth previously ascribed to <br />dangler tags. Burdick and Hamman (1993) de- <br />tected no difference in growth between PIT-tagged <br />fish and non-PIT-tagged controls. Further, 98- <br />100% tag verification was realized 20-24 months <br />after PIT tags were implanted in Colorado squaw- <br />fish. <br /> <br />687 <br />