Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~. <br /> <br />..;'.-:(":' <br />/"..'.\ ~1 <br /> <br />l0.- <br />A <br />"'~ <br />CJ\ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />CADDOA STUDIES <br /> <br /> <br />nlTERSTATE RElATIONS <br /> <br />m~~1.ilY:~ <br /> <br />The tables set rorth beloIT are sumnaries or a series. or reser- <br /> <br />voir and river operations ~ade to determine the erfect or certain possible <br /> <br />interstate agree~ents.. the basic propositions of which 'are stated herein <br /> <br />rollowing the s~ries.. The first four studies (1. 2..2A and 3) follmT <br /> <br />the basic propositio~s exactly. Difrerence in results grov,s out or vary- <br /> <br />ing lL~tations placed. on the amounts diverted by the ditches in District <br /> <br />, <br />67. and dirferent initial capacities ror the reservoir <br /> <br />sc.a1il~.ZT~'f;i ve.s '~h~,~I.dst9riOiiI~a.t~~~.....~h the river for the <br />period used in the studies.(1925-1941). <br /> <br />Table II shows the results when a fairly tight limitation ~s <br />placed on the District 67 ditohes. <br /> <br />Studies summarized in Tables III and IV allo~~d a more liberal <br /> <br />limitation en the diversions. Study 2A (Table IV) dirrers from study 2 <br /> <br />only in that initial capacities vary. as explained in a follo,nng para- <br /> <br />graph. <br /> <br />Values as shown in Table V (StUdy 3) can be -expected if practi- <br /> <br />cally no limitation is placed on District 67 diversions. It vms assUmed <br /> <br />here. that those ditches would divert near ~:L~um amounts when storage <br /> <br />releases.were made. resardless of the resulting efrect on the lands and <br /> <br />the practical linitation or need. <br />The fifth and sixth studies (Table VI and Table VII) indicate <br /> <br />the result if_ the major proposition. whereby Kansas receives amounts of <br /> <br />divertible and usable vmter at the Stateline. during reservoir releases. <br />