Laserfiche WebLink
<br />( ~ <br /> <br />whether a change af conditional water <br />rights is injurious. Hallford, <br />Conditional Water Rights at 358. Such <br />a standard is not inconsistent with <br />Twin Lakes because the contemplated <br />transmountain diversions for irrigation <br />use would have been just as consumptive <br />to the Roaring Fork River Basin as <br />transmountain diversion for municipal <br />use-both would have been 100% <br />cdnsumptive. <br />c. The "contemplated draft" standard was <br />also applied by the Division No. 5 <br />Water Court in Case No. W-2686 <br />involving the change of conditional <br />water rights for the Rocky Mountain <br />Power Company's (ROMPOCO) hydropower <br />project. ~ Appendix C. Like the <br />Independence Pass Transmountain <br />Diversion System in Twin Lakes, this <br />project proposed to divert water out of <br />the White River Basin into the Colorado <br />River Basin, without any return flow to <br />the basin of origin. <br />1) In 1975, one of the principal <br />proposed points of diversion for <br /> <br />15 <br />