Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the season of use or the points of <br /> <br /> <br />diversion from the Roaring Fork <br /> <br /> <br />River Basin. <br /> <br /> <br />2) In determining whether the change <br /> <br /> <br />of the conditional water rights <br /> <br /> <br />from irrigation to municipal use <br /> <br /> <br />would adversely affect the supply <br /> <br /> <br />remaining in the Roaring Fork Basin <br /> <br /> <br />the Oivision No. 5 Water Court <br /> <br /> <br />examined how much water would have <br /> <br /> <br />been diverted across the <br /> <br /> <br />continental divide for irrigation <br /> <br /> <br />use had the conditional decrees <br /> <br /> <br />been perfected for that use, found <br /> <br /> <br />that the maximum amount that would <br /> <br /> <br />be diverted for municipal use was <br /> <br /> <br />. no greater, and concluded that the <br /> <br /> <br />Roaring Fork River Basin suffered <br /> <br /> <br />no injury. The Colorado Supreme <br /> <br /> <br />Court endorsed this analysis. 568 <br /> <br /> <br />P2d at 49-50. <br /> <br /> <br />b. Hallford argues that where the timing <br /> <br /> <br />of diversions or more importantly the <br /> <br /> <br />amount and timing of return flows are <br /> <br /> <br />implicated, "contemplated consumption" <br /> <br /> <br />should be the standard for determining <br /> <br />14 <br />