Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-----1 <br /> <br />~}~/~ <br /> <br /><" <br />. t <br /> <br />HISTORY (continued) <br /> <br />1986 Bureau of Reclamation asks the National Academy of Sci- <br />ences, Water Science and Technology Board to evaluate the <br />Glen Canyon Environmental Studies. Tasks were to (1) review <br />and advise on studies in progress, including a general <br />assessment of how well these activities are achieving their <br />intended goals, (2) advise on interpretation of information <br />for impact analysis from the technical data that are being <br />developed, (3) provide advice on the process of identifying <br />the environmental elements for ranking operational alterna- <br />tives for Glen Canyon Dam; and (4) extrapolate from this case <br />study recommendations to others who may pursue similar envi- <br />ronmental studies at other sites in the future. <br /> <br />1987 First GCES Draft (June) Report review by agencies <br />National Academy of Science Review Committee, Second <br />Draft (August) Report reviewed by agencies, Third GCES <br />(september) Report reviewed by agencies and their <br />stituents. <br /> <br />and <br />GCES <br />Draft <br />con- <br /> <br />1988 Glen Canyon Environmental Studies <br />(January). <br /> <br />Final <br /> <br />Report <br /> <br />U88 National Academy of Science report titled "River and <br />Dam Management: A Review of the Bureau of Reclamation's Glen <br />Canyon Environmental Studies". <br /> <br />19S8 Bureau of Reclamation asks the National Academy of Sci- <br />ence to provide continued scientific program review and <br />oversight of the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies through <br />the formation of a Scientific Oversight Committee. <br /> <br />1988 All products relating to the Glen Canyon Environmental <br />Studies forwarded to the Secretary of the Interior: Glen <br />Canyon Environmental Studies Final Report, Executive Review <br />Committee Final Report, individual technical reports, Ex- <br />ecutive Summaries (summaries of the technical reports), <br />agency briefing video, and National Academy of Science re- <br />port. <br />