Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chaptcr 10. DESCRIPTION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM TO <br />ESTIMATE FUTURE SALINITY DAMAGES.............................................,........ 79 <br /> <br />l'\) <br />en <br />"'-l <br />J:;:. <br /> <br />Program feat ures . .......... ... .................. ............. ............ ......... ....................... .............. ............. <br />User instructions ............. ... ... ............... .......... ... ............ .......... .." ".. .... ...... ....... .............. "... ...... <br />Future modifications to program ......................................................................................... <br /> <br />Note: CRSDE Program and standard CRSDE input data discs are included in <br />the Instructions for Using the Colorado River Salinity Damage Estinlation Program. <br /> <br />Appendix A: BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................... 83 <br /> <br />Appendix B: LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED ................................................................ 91 <br /> <br />FIGURES <br /> <br />1. Annual salinity damages based on lO-year average salinity and 500 mg/L base ................. 6 <br />2. Annual salinity damages based on 10-year average salinity for <br />both the 500 mgIL and 334 mgfL bases .............................................................................. 6 <br />3. Salinity projections below Hoover Dam (1987 CRSS) without further controls................. 19 <br />4. Salinity projection below Parker Dam (1987 CRSS) without further controls.................... 19 <br />5. Salinity projection at Imperial Dam (1987 CRSS) without further controls........................ 19 <br />6, Regression curve of yield of oranges/tangerines vs TDS Ieve!............................................... 26 <br />7. Life span of water heaters vs. salinity level. .....,........................................................................ 41 <br />8. Annual salinity damages based on TDS in the river in 1986 <br />for both the 500 mgIL and 334 mg/L bases ........................................................................ 71 <br />9. Annual salinity damages based on TDS in the river in 1986 and the 500 mgIL base ,........ 71 <br />10. Annual salinity damages based on lO-year average salinity and the 500 mg/L base......... 73 <br />11. Annual salinity damages based on 10-year average salinity for <br />both the 500 mg/L and 334 mg/L bases .............................................................................. 73 <br />12. Annual salinity damages per household in the Lower Colorado River service area ....... 73 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />1. TDS levels considered for baseline and current condition assumptions ...................,........ <br />2. "Current" TDS values used in the study in mgiL ................................................................... <br />3. Blends of Colorado River water and local ground or surface water ................................... <br />4. Currcnt or estimated TDS levels of M&I water supplies in the <br />Lower Colorado River Basin.. ........... .................... ...,........... ........................... ....... .............. <br />5. TDS threshold levels in applied irrigation water .................................................................... <br />6. Reasons for drinking bottled water or for using a home filter system <br />in parts of California .................................... ............. ......... ............. .... ...,... ...... ....... ........... .... <br />7. Orange County Water Quality Cost Study answered by Metropolitan Water District ..... <br />8. Findings of TDS link to household damage ............................................................................ <br /> <br />--- j <br /> <br />79 <br />80 <br />80 <br /> <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />21 <br />23 <br /> <br />33 <br />36 <br />37 <br /> <br />v <br />