Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001737 <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />2. Question - Furnish tabulatiens shevnng allocations of costs, <br />capital and annual, by major fl.Ulctions in total and by individual units <br />or features, "ith comparative figures based on estimates set forth in <br />project planning repert and on revised estimates at current prices. <br /> <br />Answer - Comparative allocations of censtructien costs are <br />sw~marizod below: <br /> <br />Purpos e <br /> <br />Price Level <br />October <br />1953 <br /> <br />January <br />1953 <br /> <br />Municipal ,mter. ,. 33j129;000 $ 32,654,000 <br />. . . . ~p <br />Irrigation . . . . . . . 78:, 272,000 75,12B,000 <br />Power. . . . . . . . . . 42, 043} 000 41,945,000 <br />Fleod centrol. , 21,112,000 20,341,000 <br />. . . . . <br />Fish and \iildlife. . . 1 2,876,000 2,830,000 <br />Total . . . . . . . $177,4321000 $172,898,000 <br /> <br />Details of the preceding allocation are ShOl\'Il in table 2 through 4A. <br />Table 2, which is identical to table II, paee 6, H.D. 187, Sil0TIS the <br />segregation of construction costs at January 1953 price l~vels, and <br />O. 11. & R. expenses on projected price levels. Table 2A shows the seg- <br />regation of costs at Octob~r 1953 price levels. Table 3 presents the <br />cost allocation VQth January 1953 prices shown in table III, pago 7, <br />H.D. 187. (Table 3A presents the cost allocation using October 1953 prices, <br />Table L. shows the allocation of costs far individool featurol;l using January <br />'19'", 1Xrloe8 for construction. Table 4A presents a siniilar allocation of <br />construction costs at October 1953 price levels. <br /> <br />'4 <br />3. Question - Furnish a detailed financial anO-lysis of the proposed <br />repayment pro[ram, shO<Tint for each year of the repayment period: (a) <br />fixed and operating costs, separately and in total; (b) revenues and <br />sourceS of revenues, including preposed rates for wO-ter and pm/er (gros, <br />and net revenues aftur defraying fixed and operating costs) and their <br />applic~tion to repayment of reimbursable costs. <br /> <br />Answer - The financial analysis of the proposed repayment <br />program as requested by paragraph 3 of the qu~stionnairo has been pre- <br />pared on the basis of October 1953 construction costs. This table is <br />comparable ,nth table V in tho Secretary's Report, page 8, H.D. IJ7. <br /> <br />A detailed analysis of the project repayment is presented in table <br />5, Financial Study No.1. This analysis sho~s that the reimbursable <br />project costs can be repaid over a p~ried of 71 years. <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />