My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08221
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:47:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:49:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200.10
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History- Committee of 14
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/26/1973
Author
Herbert Brownwell
Title
The Agreement for a Permanent and Definitive Solution to the Colorado River Salinity Problem with Mexico -- A Presentation before The Colorado River Water Users Association
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-9- <br /> <br />two countries, and the risk of an adverse ruling by an international <br /> <br />tribunal. Neither Government wanted to take that risk and endure the <br /> <br />tv <br />W <br />/'\:' <br />0) <br /> <br />"law's delay." Yet.only by reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement <br /> <br />could risk and delay be avoided. By reaching a bilateral agreement the <br /> <br />two Governments confirmed that they are quite capable of reconciling by them~ <br /> <br />selves their differences in interpretation of the 1944 Water Treaty. Each <br /> <br />can now turn to the utilization of water resources that are assuredly its <br /> <br />own. <br /> <br />Of almost equal importance was the decision early arrived at that if <br /> <br />the United States must make a major concession, it must be at the cost of <br /> <br />money rather than water. The simplistic solution, as you must visualize, <br /> <br />would have been to bypass all the Wellton-Mohawk drainage water, replacing <br /> <br />it with water in storage. I don't know from whose farm or State the <br /> <br />substitution water would have had to be taken. I do not know how the <br /> <br />Congress and the courts would have allocated the burden, but, clearly, <br /> <br />because there is no surplus water, some would have suffered. However, <br /> <br />that issue might have been resolved, there would have remained the awesome <br /> <br />. spectacle of large quantities of water being wasted once again, and this <br /> <br />, <br />j <br /> <br />time deliberately, from the Colorado to the Gulf of California. Wisely, I <br /> <br />believe, we chose instead to resort to the financial resources of the <br /> <br />;i <br /> <br />country, consistent with the declaration of the Congress in the Colorado <br /> <br />River Basin Project Act (82 Stat. 887) that the satisfaction of the require- <br /> <br />ments of the Mexican Water Treaty from the Colorado River constitutes a <br /> <br />national obligation. We believe and trust that the Congress will be receptiv4 <br /> <br />to this proposition. When the desalting plant comes on stream, the only loss <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.