|
<br />0",",')'"1')
<br />.J{,.... .
<br />
<br />-6-
<br />
<br />Plan D
<br />
<br />Curecanti
<br />Taylor Park
<br />
<br />330,000 acre-feet
<br />Enlarge to a capacity within
<br />reasonable costs
<br />510,000 acre-feet
<br />308,000 acre-feet
<br />880,000 acre-feet
<br />
<br />Crystal
<br />Gateview
<br />Whitewater
<br />
<br />Ttl'l'AL
<br />
<br />*
<br />
<br /> Plan E Curecanti
<br />, Whitewater
<br /> Crystal
<br />fi TOTAL
<br /> Plan F Curecanti
<br /> Whitewater
<br /> Crystal
<br /> TOTAL
<br />
<br />940,000 acre-feet
<br />880,000 acre-feet
<br />510,000 acre-feet
<br />
<br />*
<br />
<br />330,000 acre-feet
<br />880,000 acre-feet
<br />510,000 acre-feet
<br />
<br />*
<br />
<br />*The remaining capacity required to bring the total of these
<br />combinations to a base comparable l'I'ith the Bureau plan
<br />(total active capacity of 2,480,000 acre-feet) would
<br />be placed in the most favorable sites elsewhere in the
<br />Colorado River Basin in the State of Colorado,
<br />
<br />Representatives of Region 4 agreed to undertake these studies for the
<br />information of the Committee,
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />Prior to the last meeting of the Conunittee, the Bureau: .made available
<br />to the Chairman of the Gonunittee a copy of its proposed report, dated January
<br />24, 1952, which had been requested by the Committee, This report was turned
<br />over to R. M. Gildersleeve, Chief Engineer, and Royce J, Tipton, Consulting
<br />Engineer of the Water Board, for review, Because of certain questions raised
<br />by this review, Mr, Jacobson came to Denver to discuss these matters with
<br />the engineers. Following the conference with Mr, Jacobson, further appraisal
<br />of Plan E was made by Mr. Gildersleeve and Mr, Tiptone The Bureau's January
<br />24, 1952 report is attached hereto as Appendix H; and the Gildersleeve-
<br />Tipton appraisal of Plan E is attached hereto as Appendix I,
<br />
<br />\J
<br />
<br />A summary of the work undertaken by the Committee at its last session
<br />(February 20, 21, 22, 23 and March 3) is:
<br />
<br />1.. About two days devoted to further presentation of the Cory-
<br />Peterson report, and appraisal of its contents through questions and
<br />discussion,
<br />
<br />2. Consideration of facts and figures relating to siu~lar subjects
<br />contained in the Cory-Peterson report, presented by tpe G~ison County
<br />interests, and by the report, heretofore mentioned, prepo?ed by the staf".f
<br />of the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
<br />
|