Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1i1, <br /> <br />Iii <br />11\ <br />III <br />II' <br />Iii <br />'i <br />II!, <br />,II <br />II <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />1 <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />i,! <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />: I <br /> <br />,1:11 <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />The preferred plan in this document includes Reclamation's NED component- <br />off-farm irrigation systems and winter water improvement--eoupled with SCS' <br />NED component, unchanged except for the addition of 10,050 acres designated <br />for improved surface irrigation management. The onfarm and off-farm <br />irrigation improvement NED components are interdependent in terms of <br />economic and efficient operation. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />il <br />, <br /> <br />A primary environmental effect of implementing the preferred plan would be its <br />contribution to maintaining acceptable salinity concentrations in the Colorado <br />River. The proposed project would reduce the annual salt load to the Colorado <br />River by 161,000 tons. Although total diversions would remain at the present <br />178,100 acre-feet per year, the amount of water delivered to farms would <br />increase by 5,930 acre-feet. Project-induced changes ;.n deep percolation would <br />result in net water depletions from the Colorado River. <br /> <br />I' <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />Construction of the off-farm component activities and facilities associated with <br />full implementation of the proposed project would temporarily disturb 457 acres <br />of upland salt-desert shrub, and alter or eliminate 8,330 acres of irrigation- <br />dependent wetlands. Uplands would be rehabilitated through recontouring and <br />seeding of native species. Reclamation would develop 330 acres of wetlands for <br />eventual transfer to the UDWR for management. This development would <br />replace in-kind total wetland losses projected for off-farm construction activities. <br />Replacement of wildlife habitat lost to onfarm activities would be on a <br />voluntary basis by individual landowners. Of onfarm changes impacting <br />irrigation-induced wetlands (5,260 acres), 77 percent occur in agricultural fields. <br />Of these wetlands, 97 percent are pasturelhayland or grass/sedge that are <br />routinely disturbed by mowing and grazing. Impacts to area wildlife would be <br />directly related to alterations in their habitats. Any recreational hunting lost <br />on private lands through habitat alterations as a result of the off-farm system <br />should be replaced by wildlife management areas. <br /> <br /> <br />II <br />;1, <br />'I' <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'I <br />j, <br />II <br />II <br />I, <br />i' <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />Fisheries resources within the overall project area are limited. The project <br />should improve water quality for aquatic species found in area streams. The <br />proposed project would alter local streamflows; the greatest change would be in <br />high-flow periods, with minor changes during low flows. There would be no <br />significant impact to trout populations or warm-water fisheries. <br /> <br />Two federally listed threatened and eight endangered species may inhabit the <br />proposed project area or be impacted by activities that occur within the area. <br />No terrestrial-listed plants or animals would be impacted, and the Service <br />concurs with this assessment. The proposed project would deplete annual flows <br />to the Colorado River by 25,310 acre-feet. The Service also concurs with <br />Reclamation's assessment that the proposed depletions may affect Colorado <br />River native endangered fishes, but has determined that any depletion of water <br />in the Colorado River is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the <br /> <br />U"\ ;. C. 4 ': ~ <br />v' v;" <br /> <br />I <br />,lj <br /> <br />S-10 <br />