Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In accordance with Public Law (P.L.) 84-485, power revenues must be sufficient <br />to: (1) pay all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs (OMIIR) <br />allocated to power; (2) pay all OM&R costs of storage units allocated to <br />irrigation, except for the portion paid by municipal and industrial (M&J) <br />revenues; (3) repay with interest ,within 50 years the capital investments <br />all ocated to power; (4) repay wi thout interestwithi n 50 years the i rri gati on <br />investment of the storage units, except for the portion repaid by M&I revenues; <br />(5) repay without interest within 50 years plus development periods all <br />irrigation investments of the participating projects beyond the ability of <br />the irrigators to repay and which are not repaid by M&I revenues. Al so, in <br />accordance with Public Law 93-320, power revenues must be sufficient to pay <br />the sa 1 in'ity control construction and OM&R costs whi ch are allocated to the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />Repayment studies were made by Western in February 1980 to determine the power <br />revenues needed to accomplish timely repayment of the investment costs <br />assigned to the power function. The studies indicated that a rate increase <br />of 25.8 percent will be needed. A comparison of the existing rates under <br />Rate Schedules UC-F2 and UC-FP2 effective June I, 1977, and the proposed <br />rates under Rate Schedules SP-Fl and SP-FPl is as follows: <br /> <br />Firm Capacity and Energy Exi st i ng Proposed <br />Demand charge $1.34 per kW-month $1.76 per kW-month <br />Energy charge $0.0034 per kWh $0.0041 per kWh <br />Composite rate @58.2% L.F. $0.00655 per kWh $0.00824 per kWh <br />Peaking Capacity <br />wi thout energy $1.34 per kW-month $1.76 per kW-month <br /> <br />At 58.2 percent load factor, the proposed rate is 8.24 mills per kWh, an <br />increase of 1.69 mills/kWh or 25.8 percent over the existing rate. For <br />contract violations involving unauthorized overruns, the rate will be 10 <br />times the above rates. <br /> <br />II I. Alternatives to the proposed rate adjustment <br /> <br />1. Do not adjust the power rates. <br /> <br />Discussion: Consideration was given to the alternative of not adjusting the <br />power rates. However, P.L. 84-485 requires that power revenues must be <br />sufficient to pay a substantial portion of the operation, maintenance and <br />replacement costs and repay much of both the interest-bearing and interest- <br />free investment for the storage units. Power revenues must also pay a <br />substantial portion of the interest-free investment of the participating <br />projects. Public Law 93-320 requires that CRSP power revenues pay the <br />salinity control construction, and OM&R costs which are allocated to the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. Based on the legislation, Western must pursue <br />the rate adjustment that is needed, and option 1 is not a viable alternative. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2 <br />