Laserfiche WebLink
<br />; <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />Cj <br />~ <br />~ <br />CJ <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />amount to about ~590,000 with the total being segregated as <br />follows: <br /> <br />Flood control benefits <br />Allowance for future development <br />Enhancement of land values <br />Irrigation benefits <br />Fish and Wild life benefits <br />Recreational benefits <br /> <br />$224,100 <br />24,500 <br />26,000 <br />290,000 <br />13,000 <br />12,000 <br /> <br />The ratio of benefits to costs is 1.07 to 1.00. Since <br />Fish and Wildlife and Recreational benefits would accrue <br /> <br />without additional expenditures for those purposes, no <br /> <br />costs have been allocated to them. <br /> <br />In addition, the <br /> <br />report cites non-evaluated benefits, such as secondary <br /> <br />benefits resulting from increased crop production, prevention <br /> <br />of loss of life and enhancement of the general welfare. <br />With respect to negative benefits the report states <br />that some cultivated land is located in the reservoir area, <br />that there is an item in the estimate of project costs for <br />the purchase of reservoir lands sufficiently large to <br />cover the cost of developing new cultivated lands elsewhere, <br />and no loss of crop production would result from the <br />project. An amount of $1,000 has been added to annual <br />charges to account for possible loss of taxes. <br />The report also states that the reservoir would overlie <br />some coal deposits and might prevent feasible access to <br />other adjacent deposits, and that an item has been included <br />in the estimate of project costs sufficient to compensate <br />