Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />o <br />'I <br />l'V <br />()l <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />greater than the available data indicate. <br /> <br />In this case <br /> <br />the estimated depletions might be higher than actual. <br /> <br />However, the studies are sufficient to indicate the <br /> <br />general magnitude of project effects. <br />The effect of operation under the five conditions <br />listed has also been evaluatad by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />The estimated average annual depletion would be 2,400 acre <br />feet, with as high as 10,000 acre feet in 2 years of the <br />period. It is nmt considered that this operation would <br />be possible without the provision for suitable replacement. <br />The full conservation capacity of 55,000 acre feet was <br />seldom used in the three condition study, but would be <br /> <br />essential to the five condition operation, which it is <br />estimated would provide an effective irrigation water <br /> <br />supply of 95 percent. <br /> <br />Repayment : <br /> <br />Economic studies of the Bureau of Reclamation show <br /> <br />'increased cash farm income resulting from the project <br /> <br />would be $186,000 annual, after allowances for accumula- <br /> <br />tion of equity in lands and improvements. Further <br /> <br /> <br />allowance for incentive would result in an estimated <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />maximum payment capacity of $138,000 annually. This <br />amount plus an estimated $17,000 from the proceeds of a <br />one mill tax levy on real property in 'a, proposed <br />