Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />000159 <br /> <br />NATIONAL FOREST RESERVED WATER RIGHT CLAIMS <br />COLORADO WATER DIVISION 2 <br />TECHNICAL WORKGROUP <br />STREAM SURVEY <br /> <br />SURVEY DATE: Aurmst 21.1996 <br />STREAM NAME: Echo Creek <br /> <br />STREAM NO: 65F <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY: <br />Drainage Area at Downstream Confluence: <br />Stream Gaging Stations: None <br />Average Flows: Period of Record: <br />oct nov dec jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep Total <br /> <br />cfs <br />AF <br /> <br />NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: <br />Special Wildlife\Fish Habitat: <br />Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species if any: <br />Special Considerations: <br /> <br />QUESTIONS: <br />Would CWCB instream flows meet USFS needs? If not, why not?: <br />Yes, CWCR will meet USFS needs. Subordination agreement protects existing absolute <br />and conditional water rights. <br /> <br />If water is developed from stream, what protections does the USFS know would have to <br />be provided? None identified. There is a potential that additional water may want to be <br />exchanged upto other claims in the area, but no desire was expressed to protect <br />additional exchange potential here. Suspect that stipulations protecting the CWCR' s <br />existing instream flow would be acceptable. <br /> <br />Is potential development compatible with USFS needs? If not, why not? <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />(Le. can QP's be moved, CWCB instream flows acceptable, etc.) <br />Leave QP at present location and use the CWCR's existing 2.0 cfs instreamflow as the <br />quantification. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS: List of attendees at the August 21. 1996 meeting, stream maps and lists of <br />water rights in area provided by the SED, and stipulation in case 92CW72 (N. Werbner). <br /> <br />RANDY\C:IMSOFFICEIWINWORD\D2FSRWR.FOR <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />'If <br />-, -~-'^ <br />