Laserfiche WebLink
<br />agricultural bonoficial uso, and wo have made uso of a quantita- <br /> <br />tivo basis.. If \Vo givo to powor an intra-divisional right, v/o <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />ondanger tho wholo quantitativo basis of right" For instanco, <br /> <br />wo havo seV0n and a half million foot of establishod right under <br /> <br />prosont conditions in tho upper basin, bnsod on agricultural use~ <br /> <br />Supposing that the upper basin committed itself to ten million <br /> <br />foet of the flow for powor purposos, tho southern basin would <br /> <br />havo no protection, and vice-vorsa" <br /> <br />~IRo C~RPENTbR~ At firnt thOUGht it sounds possiblo, but I <br /> <br />am not yet prepared to answor definitely. Uy ovm theught, in <br /> <br />that respect, is to avoid collision. l'.Iorc maturo thought will <br /> <br />probably clarify the vnlo10 situation. <br /> <br />1IR. HOOVER, Thero is One point you mado. I disliko the <br /> <br />word "priority,," "Priority" dOQsn't convoy what wo aro intending <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />to oonvoy. fmat WG want to convey is the moaning embraced in tho <br /> <br />word that you used. <br /> <br />~~, <br /> <br />LIR. CLRPENTER~ IPrefGrential." <br /> <br />Lill. HOOVi!:R: <br /> <br />"Subservient.." <br /> <br />lIlt.. C!I.RP3HTER~ "Subsorviont.." <br /> <br />1ill. HOOVER; Subservient rather than prior. I think that <br /> <br />is mora the moaning th<::~t oxists in your mind" <br /> <br />i,ill. C:,RPEN'l'ER, '1'0 follow that line of thought - to make <br /> <br />one right inforior to another merely implies that the higher use <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />may condemn the lov/or. Ny thought is that by tho uso of the <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />word llsubsorvionttl ':choro \vould bo a sorviont right of usO for <br /> <br />powor with dominant uses suporior to and oontrolling it, in which <br /> <br />128 <br /> <br />18th-S.P. <br />15 <br />