Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />and domestic uses must be entirely intra-divisional and also <br /> <br />involve the application of local law wi~hin each state. It is <br /> <br /> <br />my thought to confine the preferential uses (if I may use that <br /> <br /> <br />,term) to intra-divisional matters except as te navigation, which <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />would naturally spread allover the entire territory, upon tho <br /> <br />theory that uses above might be said to interfere with navigation <br /> <br />below. <br /> <br />}illl. HOOVER, Would not the power also fall in that line. <br /> <br />I can conceive a situation where, if you had a purely intra- <br /> <br />divisional priority, that prior rights might be established in <br /> <br />one division and interfere with agrlcu~tural rights in another <br /> <br />division. <br /> <br />1ill. CLRPENTER, No, with the exception of a reservoir to <br /> <br />be constructed within the uppor division for the bonefit of the <br /> <br />lower division, as at Lee's Ferry or alilY peint below the mouth <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />of the Green. 'With that exception, th~ agreement for delivery <br /> <br /> <br />at Lee's Ferry automatically takes carb of the upper situation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />and the burden is upon the upper territory to make the delivery; <br /> <br />and in making that delivery, the burden and duty is upon the <br /> <br />upper division, to control the usos abievo. The duty of delivery <br /> <br />at Leo's Forry autematically solves t~e question of claims from <br /> <br />the lowor as against tho uppor division. Bolow Lee's Forry tho <br /> <br />problom bocomes intra-divisional with'rospect to tho lower <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />territory. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1m. HOOVER, I want to follow Mr. Carponter's thought a <br /> <br />minuto. Wo havo basod this compact on ,tho division of water for <br /> <br />127 <br /> <br />18th-S.F. <br />14 <br />