My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07965
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:41:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8446
Description
Cache La Poudre Project
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/1/1983
Title
Cache La Poudre Project Study and Related Correspondence
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The financial evaluations are summarized on the fOllowing table. The base <br />data section of the table displays the total capital costs and the annual <br />operation, maintenance and replacement costs (in 1982 dollars) for each <br />alternative along with the projected on-line date of the alternative assuming <br />that planning activities begin in mid-1983 and are followed by design and <br />construction. <br /> <br />The total capital costs were escalated for inflation throughout the <br />assumed planning, design and construction period. The escalated costs were <br />then used to estimate total investment costs and the annual cost of assumed <br />debt retirement. <br /> <br />The table illustrates the total investment cost' (capital costs escalated <br />for inflation) and the annual costs (the annual amortization requirement plus <br />operation, maintenance and replacement) under the two funding approaches. The <br />table also provides the estimated cost burden on peaking power (in 1982 <br />dollars). The cost burden is expressed as a composite value of the peaking <br />power output including both a capacity and energy component. It is expressed <br />both as a cost per kilowatt-hour of energy production and as a cost per <br />kilowatt~year based on installed capacity., <br /> <br />The numbers displayed on the table clearly demonstrate the impact of <br />inflation and the difference in costs under the two financing approaches. The <br />two financing approaches were selected to illustrate two extremes of a broad <br />range of potential financial arrangements which would have to be investigated <br />further in more detailed feasibility studies. <br /> <br />F. CQiilCLUSIONS AND RECOMIIBNDATIONS <br /> <br />The present study has developed useful information about large storage <br />reservoirs in the upper Cache la Poudre, Basin. Although the uncertainties <br />associated with both the future demand for peaking power and the need for new <br />reservoirs prevent one from arriving at firm conclusions as to'what would or <br />would not be feasible 10-15 years from now, the projects examined in this <br />study appear to have been sufficiently ana~yzed for the present. <br /> <br />On the other hand, given the limitations placed upon the geographical <br />scope of this study, many questions remailn unanswered concerning the future <br />water resources needs of the Cache la po~dre Basin and the alternative means <br />available to meet var ious water resource development and management <br />objectives. Questions regarding future water and power demands, the future of <br />irrigated lands, the condition of the existing plains reservoirs and <br />alternatives to large new storage projects in the canyon (which alternatives <br />may include smaller capacity reservoir project(s) in the upper basin) all need <br />to be addressed before decisions can be 'reached on what future projects and <br />management actions might be feasible and qesirable. <br /> <br />The best means of addressing these qu~stions would be a carefully designed <br />study of basin-wide scope (upper and ,lower basin) formulated with the <br />participation of all interested parties in the basin. In March 1983, the <br />Board recommended that the General Assembly authorize the expenditure of not <br /> <br />S-6 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.