My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07926
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1991
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Resource Area - Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement - Draft - Chapter 4 to end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1'I"1~1':l7') <br />l;'....) C J . .... <br /> <br />grazing at existing allocations in the Powderhom <br />Primitive Area SRMA and in allotments 6208, 6300 <br />and 6309, could result in reduced forage and big <br />game forage quality. Domestic sheep grazing in <br />bighorn sheep ranges south and west of Lake City <br />would result in less forage for, and disease transfer <br />to, bighorn sheep, continued low bighorn sheep <br />numbers, and potentially bighorn sheep elimination <br />Crom this area. <br /> <br />Impacts from Forest Management. Prohibiting <br />harvesting from May 1 through June 30 on 5,389 <br />acres of suitable commercial forest lands in elk- <br />calving areas would prevent disturbance to elk from <br />logging during calving season. Harvests in elk <br />calving areas would reduce hiding cover for <br />pregnant and young elk, potentially resulting in the <br />areas not being used as calving areas. <br /> <br />Maintaining sufficient elk hiding cover parallel to <br />logging roads and along the perimeter of clear cuts <br />would allow elk the opportunity to use forage <br />produced in the clear cuts without being disturbed <br />from activity on nearby roads, and would screen <br />wildlife from human activity, thereby helping reduce <br />stress and disturbance to animals. <br /> <br />Requiring riparian zone values to be maintained <br />during timber harvests would protecllarge trees for <br />non-game wildlife and maintain a variety of habitats. <br />The prescribed management in Appendix A for <br />non-game wildlife regarding timber harvests would <br />provide snags for nesting habitat, perch trees for <br />raptors and brush piles and logs for small mammals. <br /> <br />Harvesting ponderosa pine and douglas fir on a <br />sustained yield basis could decrease big game <br />thermal and hiding cover at the rate of 100-150 <br />acres annually. <br /> <br />Development of additional roads in elk summer <br />range would also decrease hiding cover, and <br />increase human activity, potentially resulting in <br />changes of traditional use patterns. <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation Management. <br />Development of a visitor and administrative center <br />in Lake City could result in more effective <br /> <br />PREFERRED ALTERNAllVE(E) IMPACTS <br /> <br />educational programs about wildlife and habitat to <br />the visiting public. <br /> <br />Designating 600 acres of public land within the <br />Sapinero State Wildlife Area as ciosed to OHV use <br />would ensue OHV management consistency with <br />the adjoining CDOW land and would improve <br />management of the general area for wildlife. <br />Continuing to limit OHV use from December 1 <br />through March 31 to designated routes, if necessary, <br />on 56,740 acres of crucial elk and deer winter range <br />North of U.S. Highway 50 would prevent <br />disturbance to these animals during the most critical <br />portion of the year. <br /> <br />Development of recreation facilities and the <br />associated increased visitor use within the Alpine <br />Triangle SRMA would continue to displace bighorn <br />sheep and elk, especially along Henson Creek and <br />the upper stretch of the Lake Fork of the Gunnison <br />River, resulting in loss of habitat and utilization of <br />forage species in other, more isolated, areas. <br />Development of campsites and the associated <br />increased use along the Cochetopa Creek would <br />eliminate bighorn sheep use within 1/2 mile of these <br />areas, and could deter raptors from using the area. <br /> <br />Impacts from Transportation and Access. <br />Acquiring public road access into the Rock Creek <br />Park area via Management Uait E-lO and <br />increasing human activity in a previously <br />inaccessible area would disrupt bighorn sheep range <br />and lambing areas, and would force the herd onto <br />marginal habitat. Acquiring public access into elk <br />summer ranges and elk calving areas could result in <br />eventual timber harvests and road building for <br />logging, which would disturb elk, reduce habitat and <br />cover, and increase human activity. <br /> <br />Impacts from Acquisition of Non-Federal Lands. <br />The acquisition of private lands in crucial elk and <br />deer winter range would prevent the loss of habitat <br />through subdivision development and human <br />activities. <br /> <br />Impacts from Rights-of-Way Management. <br />Disturbances to species and habitat on about 40,613 <br />acres of bighorn sheep range and 4,752 acres of <br />crucial big game winter range would possibly be <br /> <br />4-63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.