My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07926
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1991
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Resource Area - Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement - Draft - Chapter 4 to end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER FOUR <br /> <br />Impacts from Uvestock Grazing Management. <br />Eliminating grazing and not allocating any additional <br />forage to livestock would reduce present preference <br />by 12,406 AUMs. Any decreases in AUMs could <br />result in financial losses for the affected ranching <br />operations. <br /> <br />Impacts from Forest Management. The potential <br />sale of 900 MBF of commercial timber would support <br />Planning Area income and employment and produce <br />$22,500 annually in federal revenue. On the otber <br />hand, 733 MBF of potential harvest would not be <br />available for production and would mean a potential <br />loss of $18,000 in federal revenue annually. <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation Management. Economic <br />benefits from recreation would be enhanced and <br />would be concentrated on those businesses providing <br />tourist and recreation sales and services. All ESA <br />counties are dependent on tourism-related income <br />sectors for their socio-economic well being and would <br />receive a positive impact to income and employment <br />from an estimated 30% increase in recreation activity. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON SOCIAL AND <br />ECONOMIC CONDITIONS <br /> <br />Cumulative impact on the local economy is likely to <br />be beneficial but not large given the potential losses <br />to forest production and livestock grazing. The actual <br />impact is localized but not presently quantified. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON LOCATABLE MINERALS <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Locatable Minerals Management. <br />Identifying 649,645 acres of federal mineral estate, of <br />which 101,550 acres have a high likelihood for the <br />occurrence of locatable minerals, as open to mineral <br />entry and location would make these lands available <br />for exploration and development under the general <br />mining laws. Withdrawing 78,922 acres of federal <br />mineral estate from mineral entry and location would <br />preclude any possible mineral exploration or <br />development of these lands. The lands which would <br />be withdrawn contain 8,980 acres with a high <br />likelihood for the occurrence of locatable minerals. <br /> <br />Impacts from WlidlIfe Habitat Management. <br />Designation of the proposed Bighorn Sheep - A <br />ACEC (3,912 acres) and the proposed Bighorn <br />Sheep - B ACEC (4,762 acres) would increase <br />claimant's costs by requiring plans of operation to be <br />submitted. <br /> <br />Impacts !'rom Recreation Management. Managing <br />57,851 acres as closed to OHV use would require <br />claimants to submit plans of operation prior to <br />development, thereby increasing their operating costs. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wild and Scenic River Study Segment <br />Recommendation. About 2,408 acres that would not <br />be withdrawn from mineral entry and location in this <br />alternative in the 4,315 acre Segment A of the Lake <br />Fork of the Gunnison River downstream from Sloan <br />Lake would be withdrawn for a three-year period, <br />upon a recommendation to Congress for designation <br />into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. As <br />a result, the mineral resources within the segment <br />would be unavailable for exploration and development <br />for this period. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON LOCATABLE <br />MINERALS <br /> <br />Identifying 649,645 acres of federal mineral estate, of <br />which 101,550 acres have a high likelihood for the <br />occurrence of locatable minerals, as open to mineral <br />entry and location would permit exploration and <br />development on these lands. <br /> <br />Withdrawing 78,'722 acres of federal mineral estate <br />from mineral entry and location, of which 8,980 acres <br />have a high likelihood for the occurrence ofIocatable <br />mineral, would preclude any possible mineral <br />exploration or development on these lands. <br /> <br />Closing areas to OHV use and designation of ACECs <br />would require claimants to submit plans of operation <br />prior to development, thereby increasing their <br />operating costs. <br /> <br />4-40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.