Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0%350 <br /> <br />MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Mineral development would not be constrained by <br />withdrawals, and long-term loss or delay in mineral <br />production would not occur. <br /> <br />SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />Mineral development would potentially result in some <br />increases in long-term erosion and sediment yields <br />and possibly some decrease in the quality of surface <br />waters from mine discharge and spoil pile runoff. <br />Some loss in soil productivity would be expected in <br />areas where surface disturbing activities, such as OHV <br />use and road construction occur. <br /> <br />RIPARIAN ZONES <br /> <br />Timber harvests occurring in riparian areas would <br />result in long-term decreases in the condition of these <br />areas. Livestock grazing management under this <br />alternative would result in some areas that are now in <br />good to exceUent condition experiencing a decrease in <br />condition and most other areas being stabilized and <br />experiencing an improvement in condition and <br />increased production. <br /> <br />WILDLIFE HABITAT <br /> <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife long-term herd goals for <br />elk and deer would be achieved. Land treatment <br />projects which reduce sagebrush below 25% would <br />lower sage grouse populations. <br /> <br />LIVESTOCK GRAZING <br /> <br />Disposal of 7,986 acres of public land would reduce <br />the long-term productivity by 532 AUMs. <br /> <br />VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Mineral development, livestock grazing and timber <br />harvests would result in scenic quality being lowered <br />on affected lands. <br /> <br />IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE <br />COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES <br /> <br />Irreversible or irretrievable commitments of resources <br />occur when a wide range of future management <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE D IMPACTS <br /> <br />options are precluded. This section identifies the <br />extent to which the alternatives would irreversibly <br />limit potential resource uses. The individual <br />alternative impacts sections identify those decisions <br />which apply to a particular alternative and the <br />magnitude of the impact. , <br /> <br />SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />The loss of soil through wind and water erosion would <br />be irretrievable. <br /> <br />VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Mining activities, timber harvest, and land treatment <br />projects, and the construction of permanent structures <br />such as roads, buildings, and powerlines would result <br />in an irretrievable loss of visual resources. <br /> <br />ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL <br />RESOURCES <br /> <br />The loss of archaeological or historical sites and <br />information would be irretrievable. <br /> <br />DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC LANDS <br /> <br />Disposal of 7,986 acres of public lands would result in <br />a loss of administrative control of all resource values <br />on these lands except valid existing rights and existing <br />land use authorizations. <br /> <br />IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVE D <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON SOCIAL AND <br />ECONOMIC CONDITIONS <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Oil, Gas and Geothermal Management. <br />The Planning Area would not experience measurable <br />social or economic impacts because of the low <br />potential for occurrence of these resources. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wildlife Habitat Management. <br />Increases in forage supply would translate into <br />increases in game populations and in recreational <br />activities associated with them and would lead to <br />increases in Planning Area income and employment. <br /> <br />4-39 <br />