Laserfiche WebLink
<br />QY!3~5 <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON RECREATION <br />MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation Management Additional <br />and improved campground facilities, improved hiking <br />trails, and increased visitor contacts would enhance <br />visitor use, and the enjoyment and understanding of <br />resources in the planning area. <br /> <br />Maintaining near-current OHV designations on public <br />land (373,916 acres open, 92,927 acres limited to <br />designated routes year long, 74, 7(f] acres limited <br />seasonally if necessary for wintering big game, and <br />43,462 areas closed) would ensure a variety of desired <br />recreation settings and opportunities in the Planning <br />Area. <br /> <br />Minor adjustments to OHV designations would <br />preserve the area's primitive recreational setting. <br /> <br />I~pacts from Locatable Minerals Management. <br />Mmeral entry and location being precluded on 45,282 <br />acres of federal mineral estate would prevent any <br />possible mineral exploration or development on tbose <br />lands witb low or no likelihood for the occurrence of <br />locatable minerals, and would protect the integrity of <br />recreation settings and experiences. Mining on <br />federal mineral estate not withdrawn could <br />significantly alter recreation settings and experiences. <br />Tbe greatest potential for development exists on about <br />110,528 acres witb a higb likelihood for tbe <br />occurrence of locatable minerals. <br /> <br />Impacts from Saleable Mineral Management <br />Surface disturbance associated with disposal of <br />mineral m~terials could cbange recreation settings. <br />Adverse unpacts to recreation settings and <br />experiences from potential surface disturbance <br />associated with mineral material disposal would be <br />min;mi7~d by mitigating measures being applied to <br />disposal authorizations. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wildlife Habitat and Fisbery Resources <br />(Aqnatic Habitat) Management. Improvement of <br />Wildlife habitat through land treatment projects, <br />seedings, and stream rehabilitation would result in <br /> <br />CURRENT MANAGEMENT IMPACTS <br /> <br />marginal increases in the numbers of recreationists <br />primarily fishers and bunters. ' <br /> <br />Impncts from Livestock Gl'llzing Management. <br />Extensive land treatment projects tbat reduce scenic <br />quality would result in alterations to current <br />recreation settings and decrease visitor use in those <br />areas. <br /> <br />Domestic sheep grazing near and above timberline <br />wo~d diminish recreation settings and experiences, <br />particularly for backcountry visitors. <br /> <br />Impacts from Forest Management Timber harvests <br />would result in a loss or change in recreation <br />experiences, ROS settings, and scenic quality. Visitor <br />use of these areas would decrease over the short-term <br />from tbis increase in logging activity. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wilderness Stndy Area Management. <br />Managing wilderness study areas under interim <br />management guidelines would provide wilderness and <br />primitive experience for the public. The wilderness <br />and primitive cbaracter of the land would be <br />maintained. <br /> <br />Impacts from Historical Resource Management The <br />identification, stabilization and interpretation of <br />bisto~cal resources would enhance the setting and <br />experIence of recreation visitors. <br /> <br />Impacts from Transportation and Access. <br />Acquisition of public access into nine areas would <br />increase recreational visitor use and would make <br />available more public land for recreational activities <br />such as hunting, sightseeing and OHV use. <br /> <br />Impacts from Acquisition of Non-Federal Lands. <br />Tbe acquisition of inholdings and lands with <br />signifi~t recreation resources would expand public <br />recreatIOnal opportunities and would eliminate <br />potential private development on these lands. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON RECREATION <br />MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />Imp.'?ved recreation facilities, development of <br />additIOnal campgrounds, and acquisition of access <br />would increase the number of visitors to this area by <br /> <br />4-9 <br />