Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />':', <br /> <br />)': <br />~ <br />, <br />'.",' <br />":': <br /> <br />,~' <br /> <br />~~! <br />':1 <br /> <br />-',,, <br /> <br />'.;-;: <br />1 <br /> <br />"', <br /> <br />,:;. <br /> <br />~' :: <br />,!,' <br /> <br />.'." <br />'~,:, <br />~~;:'>.,~ <br />,+,' <br />'~ <br /> <br />-"~ <br /> <br />, .~ <br /> <br />,';' <br />,,' <br /> <br />~:~; <br />/ <br /> <br />I ;f: <br />f;~_ <br /> <br />N <br /><.c <br />"J" <br />N <br />o <br />Co <br /> <br />Section 5 <br /> <br />ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF WATER TREATMENT PROCESS OPTIONS <br /> <br />Economic comparisons of the five water treatment process options were <br />developed on a basis of January, 1986 dollars and economic factors provided by <br />Nevada Power Company. <br /> <br />EQUIPMENT COST ESTIMATES <br /> <br />Appraisal level cost estimates, with an accuracy of plus or minus 25%, were <br />developed for the five selected process options. These costs include equip- <br />ment, engineering, and installation and construction. Engineering cost is es- <br />timated at 20% of the equipment cost. Installation and construction cost is <br />estimated as 1.75 times the equipment cost for each option. Equipment cost <br />estimates assume complete installation Including site preparation, piping, <br />electrical, controls and Instrumentation. <br /> <br />The circulating water system design for al I options assumes the use of <br />titanium condenser tubes and sulfate resistant concrete for cool ing tower <br />basins and I inlng of circulating water piping. An additional equipment cost <br />increase of $2,000,000 was added to Options I, II and I II to account for <br />higher quality materials required for corrosion protection in the cool ing <br />towers and in the auxiliary cooling systems. <br /> <br />Evaporation pond costs are estimated at $125,000 per acre assuming single high <br />density polyethylene membrane lining and an underdraln and monitoring system. <br />This cost is based on recent evaporation pond design and construction ex- <br />periences at other western power plants. The actual cost of evaporation ponds <br />wll I be subject to Site-specific evaluations of geologic conditions and lo- <br />cally available alternative lining materials. <br /> <br />EquIpment cost estimates assume complete Installation includIng piping, <br />electrical, controls and instrumentation. <br /> <br />Option I (LV) - Ix Softening/Sidestream Softening/VCE/Evaporation Ponds <br /> <br />The battery I imits for the ion exchange softening system include the raw water <br />Inlet to the Ion exchange softening system, the discharge to the cooling tower <br />basins, the wastewater surge pond and the evaporation ponds. The boundaries <br />of the wastewater treatment system include the surge pond Inlet, the makeup <br />points to the condensate system, the ash and the FGD systems, and the evapora- <br />tion ponds. Water system equipment for the Option I cost estimate includes: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Eighteen 10 foot diameter by 15 foot hIgh I ined ion exchange sof- <br />tener vessels, tanks for Ion exchange regenerant and rinse <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />One 3,500,000 gallon membrane I ined collection basin with three <br />9,000 gpm pumps <br /> <br />5-1 <br /> <br />~- ,.~ <br />